Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Exploring the experiences of content experts with item vetting during item bank development
Anbreen Aziz1, Mashaal Sabqat2, Faiza Kiran3
1Anbreen Aziz, BDS, MHPE, AFHEA Assistant Professor, Department of Medical Education, HBS Medical and Dental College, Islamabad.
Objective:
To explore content experts' experiences with item vetting during item bank development at a public sector medical university of Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Methods:
An exploratory study was carried out from December 2022 to February 2023 at a public sector medical college of Rawalpindi. A purposive sampling technique was employed to collect data from all content experts of the study institute who participated in item vetting activity during pre-exam moderation in the university. A pilot-tested semi-structured interview guide was utilized, interviews were audio recorded and later transcribed. Participants' anonymity was ensured. Various quality assurance strategies were employed to ensure the trustworthiness of the findings. Thematic analysis was performed on the transcribed data and themes were finalized by achieving consensus among all authors.
Results:
Six themes overarching the fourteen subthemes emerged from the data. Participants expressed a profound sense of satisfaction and valued their experience in refining expertise in constructing multiple-choice questions (MCQs). It was widely acknowledged that such activities not only contribute to the enhancement of item development skills but also improve quality of items.
Conclusions:
The consistent implementation of item vetting routines, in conjunction with diligent adherence to item writing protocols, contributes to quality assurance measures in assessment. Item bank development for fair and transparent assessment ensures production of competent healthcare professionals filtering incompetent ones hence improving health care services in the community.
More Related Videos
00:08A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Experimental Designs
Hindsight Biases
Confirmation Biases
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...