Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

A High-throughput Compatible Assay to Evaluate Drug Efficacy against Macrophage Passaged Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Published on: March 24, 2017
Conversion or Reversion of Interferon γ Release Assays for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection: A Systematic Review
Mao-Shui Wang1,2, Jarrod Li-Hunnam3, Ya-Li Chen1,2
1Department of Lab Medicine, Shandong Public Health Clinical Center, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Background:
Interferon γ release assays (IGRAs) are widely used for diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection. However, with repeated testing, IGRA transformation (conversion or reversion) may be detected and is challenging to interpret. We reviewed the frequency of and risk factors for IGRA transformation.
Methods:
We screened public databases for studies of human participants that reported the frequency of IGRA transformation. We extracted study and participant characteristics, details of IGRA testing and results. We calculated the pooled frequency of IGRA transformation (and transient transformation) and examined associated risk factors.
Results:
The pooled frequency of IGRA conversion or reversion from 244 studies was estimated at 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1%-8.5%) or 22.8% (20.1%-25.7%), respectively. Transient conversion or reversion were estimated at 46.0% (95% CI, 35.7%-56.4%) or 19.6% (9.2%-31.7%) of conversion or reversion events respectively. Indeterminate results seldom reverted to positive (1.2% [95% CI, .1%-3.5%]). IGRA results in the borderline-positive or borderline-negative range were associated with increased risk of conversion or reversion (pooled odds ratio [OR] for conversion, 4.15 [95% CI, 3.00-5.30]; pooled OR for reversion, 4.06 [3.07-5.06]). BCG vaccination was associated with decreased risk of conversion (OR, 0.70 [95% CI, .56-.84]), cigarette smoking with decreased risk of reversion (0.44 [.06-.82]), and female sex with decreased risk of either conversion or reversion (OR for conversion, 0.66 [.58-.75]; OR for reversion, 0.46 [.31-.61]).
Conclusions:
IGRA conversion is less common than reversion, and frequently transient. Research is needed to determine whether individuals with reversion would benefit from tuberculosis-preventive treatment. Retesting of people with indeterminate results is probably not indicated, because indeterminate results seldom revert to positive.
More Related Videos
09:57System for Efficacy and Cytotoxicity Screening of Inhibitors Targeting Intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Published on: April 5, 2017
15:57Application of Long-term cultured Interferon-γ Enzyme-linked Immunospot Assay for Assessing Effector and Memory T Cell Responses in Cattle
Published on: July 11, 2015