Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
A novel deforestation risk and baseline allocation model for the next generation of nested REDD+ projects
Jeremy Freund1, Maren Pauly2, Will Gochberg1
1Wildlife Works, Mill Valley, CA, USA.
Abstract:
Nature-based solutions that use a counterfactual scenario depend heavily on the methodology used to determine the business as usual (BAU) case, i.e., the "baseline." Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) projects traditionally set baselines using a "reference area" as a control for estimating BAU deforestation and emissions in the treatment (project) area. While the REDD+ market is shifting from project-based to nested approaches as countries increase their efforts to meet nationally determined contributions (NDCs) to the Paris agreement's global climate target, methodologies for allocating national baselines are not yet formalized and tested, despite an urgent need to scale the market. We present a novel method for mapping deforestation risk and allocating national forest reference emission levels (FREL) to projects: baseline allocation for assessed risk (BAAR). This approach provides a spatial predictor of future deforestation using a dynamic vector, and a method for allocating a FREL to differentiated risk areas at the project level. Here, we present BAAR using 34 REDD+ projects in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). We demonstrate the importance of risk-based FREL allocations to balance fitness for purpose and scientific rigor. We show how BAAR can be used by governments to focus voluntary carbon market finance in areas at highest risk of imminent deforestation, while maintaining alignment with nationally determined contribution (NDC) goals.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Habitat Fragmentation
Threats to Biodiversity
Conservation of Declining Populations
Relative Risk
Conservation of Small Populations

