Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 12, 2026
The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Prevalence of elevated sNFL in a real-world setting: Results on 908 patients with different multiple sclerosis types
Cecilia Irene Bava1, Paola Valentino2, Simona Malucchi3
1NICO - Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi, Orbassano, Italy; CRESM Biobank, University Hospital San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy; Department of Neurology and CRESM, University Hospital San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy.
Background:
In the field of research for new validated surrogate biomarkers of treatment efficacy, disease activity and progression in Multiple Sclerosis (MS), serum neurofilament light-chain (sNFL) are actually the best candidate for MS patient monitoring. However, before they can be implemented in clinical practice, their usefulness as additional red flag routine measure must be demonstrated. To tackle the problem, this real-life cross-sectional study at the Regional Referring Center for Multiple Sclerosis (CRESM) aims to characterize sNFL levels and prevalence of elevated sNFL, according to our age-dependent cut-off values, in a large group of patients with different types of MS and treatment conditions.
Methods:
908 serum samples from as many MS patients being admitted at CRESM for diagnostic definition and/or during routinary treatment monitoring were consecutively collected between January 2019 and January 2020. sNFL levels were measured by single molecule array (Simoa™) technology on SR-X instrument using NF-light assays (Quanterix); results were interpreted using previously published cut-off values.
Results:
Primary and Secondary Progressive MS (PPMS, SPMS) forms demonstrate higher levels and prevalence of elevated sNFL (PPMS= 32 %, SPMS= 21 %) compared to the Relapse and Remitting one (RRMS = 12 %). Besides, naïve samples of RRMS and PPMS subtypes showed higher prevalence of elevated sNFL (RRMS naïve= 31 %, PPMS naïve=67 %) compared to samples from patients treated for more than 12 months (RRMS treat>12m= 9 %, PPMS treat>12m= 19 %); treated SPMS patients demonstrated higher sNFL levels and a prevalence (22 %) of elevated sNFL compared to RRMS treated patients. Focusing on RRMS, no statistical difference was found between groups of patients treated for whatever time (up to or more than 60 months) and with either DMT type (high or low-efficacy DMT). Finally, RRMS patients treated with all DMTs for more than 12 months, with the exception of teriflunomide and alemtuzumab showed a prevalence of elevated sNFL in the range of 5-10 %.
Conclusion:
in a real-world setting comprising about 1000 MS patients, sNFL quantification was elevated in 5-to-67 % of patients, in different MS forms and treatment conditions. Elevated levels of sNFL must be considered a red-flag suggesting the need of a further clinical monitoring in any circumstance, as it can be indicative of new inflammation, ongoing degeneration or co-morbidities. This study supports the introduction of sNFL quantification in everyday patient management.
