Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effects of Self-distancing in Young Children
Published on: March 1, 2019
The impact of strategies on young children's saving for the future
Ege Kamber1, Madi K Maguire1, Edyta K Tehrani1
1Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1, Canada.
Insights
Preschoolers
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Saving behavior emerges around age 3 but is low in preschoolers.
- Existing strategies to improve saving include prompts, budgeting, and psychological distance.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate saving development in early childhood.
- Assess the impact of budgeting, tracking, and psychological distance on children's saving.
- Examine age-related changes in strategy effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- 254 Canadian children aged 3–5 participated.
- Children played the Saving Board Game with assigned strategies (control, budgeting, tracking, adult perspective, child perspective).
- Parents completed a saving subscale of the Children's Future Thinking Questionnaire.
Main Results:
- Older children (5-year-olds) saved more than younger children (3-year-olds).
- No tested strategy significantly increased children's token saving.
- Strategy effectiveness did not vary with age.
Conclusions:
- Budgeting, tracking, and psychological distance strategies did not enhance saving in preschoolers.
- Parent-reported saving correlated with game performance only in the control group.
- Further research is needed to understand why these interventions failed.
Abstract:
The ability to save resources for future use, or saving, begins to emerge around 3 years of age, but children show low rates of saving during the preschool years. Thus, several strategies have been used to improve preschoolers' saving, such as providing a prompt, budgeting, increasing psychological distance, and simulating the future. The current study investigated (a) the development of saving in early childhood, (b) the impact of several saving strategies on children's saving (i.e., budgeting, tracking expenses, and psychological distance), and (c) whether the effectiveness of the strategies changed with age. Here, 3- to 5-year-old Canadian children (N = 254) completed the Saving Board Game, and their parents completed the saving subscale of the Children's Future Thinking Questionnaire. In the Saving Board Game, children were randomly assigned to one of the five strategies: (a) control, (b) budgeting, (c) tracking, (d) adult perspective, or (e) child perspective. An analysis of covariance with age, strategy, and response option order (as a covariate) showed a main effect of age, with 5-year-olds saving more than 3-year-olds. There was no effect of strategy or an interaction between strategy and age on children's token saving. Parent-reported child saving was positively correlated with children's Saving Board Game performance only in the control condition. We consider why these strategies failed to increase children's saving.
Related Concept Videos
Life Histories
Information Processing Approach
Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development
Conservation and Constancy of Quantity
A significant cognitive milestone in the...
Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development from Childhood into Adulthood
Schemata: Building Blocks of...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Environmental Influences on Intelligence

