Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

535
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
535
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

502
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
502
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

664
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
664
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

3.5K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
3.5K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

38.1K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
38.1K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.6K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Community-based tuberculosis screening with computer-aided detection technology alone and in combination with point-of-care C-reactive protein testing: a paired screen-positive trial.

The Lancet. Infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Assessment of modifications to a blind-sweep ultrasound protocol for improved lower-uterus imaging by novice operators.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Large Language Model Automated Extraction of Clinical Signs and Symptoms From Emergency Department Reports for Machine Learning Prediction Models: Development and Validation Study.

JMIR medical informatics·2026
Same author

Leveraging open-source large language models for clinical information extraction in resource-constrained settings.

JAMIA open·2025
Same author

Artificial intelligence-based identification of thin-cap fibroatheromas and clinical outcomes: the PECTUS-AI study.

European heart journal·2025
Same author

Segmenting Whole-Body MRI and CT for Multiorgan Anatomic Structure Delineation.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2025
Same journal

Generative morphodynamic forecasting enables robust zero-shot volumetric medical segmentation.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

ContiMorph: An unsupervised learning framework for cardiac motion tracking with time-continuous diffeomorphism.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

MedP-CLIP: Medical CLIP with region-aware prompt integration.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

Multi-organ guided diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment via hierarchical alignment and knowledge distillation.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

SUDA: Simultaneous unsupervised knowledge distillation and adaptation of foundation models for efficient pathological image analysis.

Medical image analysis·2026
Same journal

Beyond the LUMIR challenge: The pathway to foundational registration models.

Medical image analysis·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Integrated Photoacoustic Ophthalmoscopy and Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography
11:21

Integrated Photoacoustic Ophthalmoscopy and Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Published on: January 15, 2013

11.5K

Uncertainty-aware multiple-instance learning for reliable classification: Application to optical coherence

Coen de Vente1, Bram van Ginneken2, Carel B Hoyng3

  • 1Quantitative Healthcare Analysis (QurAI) Group, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands; Diagnostic Image Analysis Group (DIAG), Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.

Medical Image Analysis
|July 3, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning models struggle with medical images from different scanners due to artifacts. Uncertainty-Based Instance eXclusion (UBIX) improves reliability by excluding artifact-corrupted data, enhancing AI model applicability across diverse datasets.

Keywords:
GeneralizabilityInterpretabilityOptical coherence tomographyOut-of-distribution detection

More Related Videos

Optical Coherence Tomography: Imaging Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells In Vivo
08:17

Optical Coherence Tomography: Imaging Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells In Vivo

Published on: September 22, 2017

19.2K
Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy oSLO and Optical Coherence Tomography OCT
12:22

Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy oSLO and Optical Coherence Tomography OCT

Published on: August 4, 2018

8.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Integrated Photoacoustic Ophthalmoscopy and Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography
11:21

Integrated Photoacoustic Ophthalmoscopy and Spectral-domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Published on: January 15, 2013

11.5K
Optical Coherence Tomography: Imaging Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells In Vivo
08:17

Optical Coherence Tomography: Imaging Mouse Retinal Ganglion Cells In Vivo

Published on: September 22, 2017

19.2K
Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy oSLO and Optical Coherence Tomography OCT
12:22

Multimodal Volumetric Retinal Imaging by Oblique Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy oSLO and Optical Coherence Tomography OCT

Published on: August 4, 2018

8.5K

Area of Science:

  • Medical image analysis
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Computer vision

Background:

  • Deep learning models for medical imaging often exhibit reduced performance on data from scanners different from those used for training.
  • Vendor-specific artifacts in medical scans are a primary cause of this poor generalizability.
  • Existing models may not reliably perform across diverse clinical settings without retraining.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate Uncertainty-Based Instance eXclusion (UBIX), a novel method to enhance the reliability of deep learning classification models.
  • To improve the generalizability of medical image analysis models to data from different vendors and scanners.
  • To address the challenge of vendor-specific artifacts impacting model performance in optical coherence tomography (OCT) for age-related macular degeneration staging.

Main Methods:

  • UBIX is an inference-time module designed for multiple-instance learning (MIL) settings.
  • It detects and reduces the contribution of artifact-corrupted instances (e.g., 2D slices) to the overall bag-level prediction (e.g., volumetric image) using uncertainty estimation.
  • Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is employed to identify instances with unseen artifacts.

Main Results:

  • When applied to external datasets with vendor-specific artifacts, UBIX demonstrated reliable performance, with a slight decrease in quadratic weighted kappa (κw) from 0.861 to 0.708.
  • A state-of-the-art 3D neural network without UBIX experienced a significant performance drop (κw from 0.852 to 0.084) on the same external datasets.
  • UBIX successfully identified instances with unseen artifacts, reducing their influence on predictions without requiring model retraining.

Conclusions:

  • UBIX effectively enhances the reliability and generalizability of deep learning models in medical image analysis, particularly in the presence of scanner-specific artifacts.
  • The method improves model robustness when applied to data from different vendors, mitigating performance degradation.
  • UBIX offers a promising solution for increasing the practical applicability of artificial intelligence in diverse clinical environments without the need for extensive retraining.