Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025
The Combined Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Robotic Therapy for the Upper Limb
Published on: September 23, 2018
Effect of Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Dual-Target Stimulation on Lower Limb Function in Patients with
Luoyi Deng1, Ning Song2, Jia Wang1
1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, PR China.
Objective:
To explore the influence of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) dual-target stimulation on lower limb function in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI).
Methods:
A randomized, single -blind, sham-controlled trial was used in this study. Thirty iSCI patients with lower limb dysfunction meeting the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into a sham group and an iTBS group, with 15 cases in each group. The iTBS group received conventional rehabilitation therapy combined with iTBS dual-target stimulation on the central cerebral sulcus and the nerve root of the spinal cord injury segment. The sham group was treated with conventional rehabilitation therapy combined with iTBS dual-target sham stimulation therapy. Comprehensive functional assessment was performed on all patients before treatment, on the day 3 and day 21 of treatment. The main evaluation indicators were as follows: amplitude and latency of motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the anterior tibial muscles of both lower limbs, latency of sensory-evoked potential (SEP) of both lower limbs, knee flexor strength and knee extensor strength, lower extremity motor score (LEMS), lower extremity sensory score, spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) score, and gait parameters (stride speed, stride frequency, stride length, and ground reaction force).
Results:
On day 21 of treatment, in the iTBS group, the MEP amplitude of the anterior tibial muscles increased, the latency of MEP shortened, knee flexor strength and knee extensor strength increased, and the LEMS and SCIM score of both lower limbs increased. In addition, there were statistically significant differences in the muscle strength of the knee flexion muscle, knee extensor muscle, MEP amplitude, LEMS, and SCIM between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). Among the 10 patients who could walk with an assisted walker, the step length and step frequency of the iTBS group were increased compared with the sham group after treatment (P < 0.01), and the ground reaction force was increased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the lower extremity sensory score of the lower limbs between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusions:
ITBS dual-target stimulation can significantly improve the motor function of both lower limbs in patients with iSCI but does not significantly improve the sensory function of both lower limbs. Therefore, this treatment mode may participate in the reconstruction and repair of some nerve circuits in patients with iSCI. In addition, iTBS dual-target stimulation can improve the ability of iSCI patients to perform daily living.
