Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biological, biomechanical, and pain sensitivity effects of walk-run in people with self-reported knee osteoarthritis.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026
Same author

Rugby tackle kinematics in adolescent players: effects of tackle height and shoulder side.

Sports biomechanics·2026
Same author

Modern teaching for clinical education involving manual therapy: a 6-pillar approach.

Chiropractic & manual therapies·2026
Same author

Dataset for rapid estimation of femoral neck loading during gait and dynamic exercises.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

Chemical peel injury: A retrospective database analysis of judicial precedents.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology·2026
Same author

Intra-individual reliability of blood bicarbonate responses and gastrointestinal symptoms following sodium citrate supplementation.

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2025

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

12.5K

Quantifying lumbar mobility using a single tri-axial accelerometer.

David W Evans1, Ian T Y Wong2, Hoi Kam Leung2

  • 1School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Heliyon
|July 4, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A single tri-axial accelerometer shows high correlation with multi-sensor Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) for measuring lumbar flexion mobility and velocity, offering a feasible alternative for remote monitoring in low back pain (LBP) management.

Keywords:
Flexion velocityInertial measurement unitLow back painLumbar mobilityRemote monitoringTri-axial accelerometer

More Related Videos

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
07:24

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis

Published on: August 8, 2019

6.7K
Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
06:28

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Published on: December 13, 2024

472

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2025

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

12.5K
Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
07:24

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis

Published on: August 8, 2019

6.7K
Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
06:28

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Published on: December 13, 2024

472

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Medical instrumentation
  • Rehabilitation technology

Background:

  • Lumbar mobility is crucial for assessing and managing low back pain (LBP).
  • Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) are feasible for quantifying lumbar mobility but susceptible to gyroscope drift errors, limiting long-term remote monitoring.
  • Accurate and feasible alternatives to IMUs are needed for continuous lumbar mobility assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if a single tri-axial accelerometer can accurately and feasibly quantify lumbar flexion mobility and velocity compared to a multi-sensor IMU.
  • To determine the reliability of accelerometer-based measurements for lumbar movement analysis.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional study involving 18 healthy adults performing spinal flexion movements.
  • Quantification of lumbar flexion mobility and velocity using both a multi-sensor IMU and a single tri-axial accelerometer.
  • Statistical analysis including correlation assessment and Generalized Additive Models (GAM) to compare the two methods across the movement cycle.

Main Results:

  • Very high correlations (r > 0.90) were observed between the accelerometer and IMU for both lumbar flexion angles and velocities during most of the movement cycle.
  • The accelerometer showed overestimation of flexion angle at the start and end of movement cycles and underestimation in the middle range.
  • Differences in flexion velocity measurements were noted at the start and end of the movement cycle between the two devices.

Conclusions:

  • A single tri-axial accelerometer presents a feasible alternative to multi-sensor IMUs for quantifying lumbar mobility and velocity.
  • This finding supports the potential for cost-effective, continuous remote monitoring of lumbar mobility in LBP management.
  • Accelerometer-based monitoring could enhance accessibility and efficiency in clinical and research settings for LBP assessment.