Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025
Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
A Concordance Between Clinical and Pathological Tumor Staging of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Institutional Study
Dharini S1, Karthikeyan Ramalingam1, Pratibha Ramani1
1Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Background:
Among oral diseases, oral cancer is the primary cause of death and poses a serious health risk. Primary tumor (T) - regional lymph node (N) - distant metastasis (M) comprising (TNM) staging is crucial for planning treatment strategies for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).
Aim:
This study evaluated the predictive accuracy of clinical TNM staging of OSCC to histopathological staging (pTNM) in an institutional setting.
Materials And Methods:
Fifty-four consecutive histologically confirmed, surgically treated OSCC cases were evaluated for TNM staging. The study compared the clinical staging at the time of surgery with the pathological staging obtained from excisional biopsy reports. Microsoft Excel (Microsoft® Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) was used for the data compilation and descriptive analysis. The chi-square test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey's Honest Significant Difference (HSD) posthoc test were used to compare the data for statistical significance with p value <0.05 using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corp., Version 23.0, Armonk, NY).
Results:
The alveolar mucosa (n=22, 40.74%) was the most frequently occurring site, followed by the tongue (n=17, 31.48%). Out of the 54 included cases, based on clinical tumor size, there were T1 (n=6), T2 (n=13), T3 (n=13), T4a (n=16) and T4b (n=6). T2 tumors were usually upstaged (n=7) while T4a (n=8) tumors were most often downstaged. T4a (n=8) had the best concordance between clinical and histopathological staging, followed by T2, T3, and T1. In nodal status, N1 showed the most variation. The chi-squared test showed statistical significance for tumor size comparison (p <0.001) and nodal status comparison (p=0.002). ANOVA test did not show any statistical significance. Tukey's HSD posthoc test showed statistical significance (p=0.034) for N0 and N1 status. The highest concordance was shown by N0 and N1 followed by N2b.
Conclusion:
Preoperative radiological and clinical assessments are essential for deciding on a patient's course of treatment. However, not all patients may require radiographs to determine tumor size or nodal status assessment. Accurate diagnosis is vital for the treatment planning of OSCC.
