Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.1K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.1K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.6K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Testing for Dose-Response Relationships in Health Messaging: Dosage, Framing, and Intentions to Exercise.

Journal of health communication·2026
Same author

Associations between Perceived Costs and Rewards of Sun Protection and Sun Safety Practices among Rural and Urban High School Students.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2026
Same author

Persuasive Impact of Loss and Gain Frames on Intentions to Exercise: A Test of Six Moderators.

Communication monographs·2026
Same author

Expanding the Theory of Persuasive Hope: Identifying Mechanisms of Hope's Effect on Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing Intentions.

Health communication·2025
Same author

Preprints in COVID-19 news coverage: Comparing student and general population perceptions of preliminary science about booster vaccination.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2025
Same author

The importance of structural elements in narrative persuasion: Using the narrative immersion model to promote melanoma prevention.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 22, 2025

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

16.0K

Validating Cross-Modal Measures for Comparative Research: Message Veracity, Novelty, and Memorability.

Jakob D Jensen1, Melinda M Krakow2, Katheryn R Christy3

  • 1University of Utah.

Psychology & Marketing
|July 4, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Researchers developed new cross-modal message perception measures, including veracity, novelty, and memorability. These validated tools enable better comparison of how different message types, like narratives and arguments, influence outcomes in marketing research.

Keywords:
argumentcomparativememorabilitymessage effectsmodenarrativenoveltyveracity

More Related Videos

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.5K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 22, 2025

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm
06:43

The Crossmodal Congruency Task as a Means to Obtain an Objective Behavioral Measure in the Rubber Hand Illusion Paradigm

Published on: July 26, 2013

16.0K
Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
08:05

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.5K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Marketing Research
  • Communication Studies
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Marketing research frequently compares message modes like narratives and arguments for persuasiveness.
  • Existing research lacks standardized measures applicable across diverse message formats, hindering comparative analysis of underlying mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and validate cross-modal message perception measures.
  • To establish veracity, novelty, and memorability as reliable metrics for comparing narrative and argument message effects.
  • To provide tools for advancing comparative message effects research.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted three empirical studies with varying sample sizes (N=105, N=322, N=248).
  • Validated the factor structure, discriminant validity, and cross-modal applicability of three proposed message perception measures.
  • Utilized statistical analyses to confirm the reliability and validity of the new measures across narrative and argument message modes.

Main Results:

  • Confirmed the factor structure for veracity, novelty, and memorability measures.
  • Demonstrated discriminant validity, showing these perceptions are distinct constructs.
  • Validated the cross-modal value of these perceptions for comparing narrative and argument message effects.

Conclusions:

  • Introduced three validated cross-modal message perception measures: veracity, novelty, and memorability.
  • These measures effectively mediate the relationship between message modes and outcomes.
  • The findings equip researchers with essential tools for robust comparative analysis in message effects research.