Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Dried Blood Spots - Preparing and Processing for Use in Immunoassays and in Molecular Techniques
Published on: March 13, 2015
Determination of Reference Intervals of Some Biochemistry Tests by the Bhattacharya and Hoffmann Methods
Background:
Clinical laboratory tests are being evaluated with reference intervals (RI). Therefore, it is important that each laboratory determines and classifies its own reliable RI for each test to ensure an accurate and effective interpretation. The proposed method for determining RI is the "direct" approach, but it is a difficult, troublesome, time-consuming, and expensive method. An alternative approach is the "indirect" approach. In this study, we aimed to compare the RI values determined by the indirect method from the Calcium (Ca), Magnesium (Mg), Phosphate (P), 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D (25(OH)D), and Parathyroid hormone (PTH) test results with the RI provided by the manufacturer.
Methods:
A total of 1,520,314 Ca, Mg, P, 25(OH)D, and PTH test results, which were studied in our laboratory between January and November 2022, were included in the study. Data cleaning was done for individuals between the ages of 18 - 89, and only one record was allowed. The Tukey method was used to determine and exclude extreme values. Ca and Mg tests were divided into age groups (18 - 59 and 60 - 89 years), P, 25(OH)D, and PTH tests were divided into female - male groups. RI was calculated by using the Bhattacharya and Hoffmann methods. CLIA 19 acceptable limits were used to evaluate the compliance with the manufacturer's RI.
Results:
The RI results obtained by applying the Bhattacharya and Hoffmann methods were found to be significantly consistent and compatible with each other. According to the manufacturer's RI, Ca and Mg were compatible with RI in both methods, P was considered compatible with PTH and 25(OH)D upper reference limit in the Bhattacharya method, P was considered compatible with 25(OH)D lower reference limit and PTH upper reference limit in the Hoffmann method, while 25(OH)D lower reference limit was found to be different in the Bhattacharya method, and 25(OH)D upper reference limit and PTH lower reference limit were found to be different in the P male group in the Hoffmann method.
Conclusions:
We believe that it is of great importance for each laboratory to determine the RI specific for the population they serve and to choose the analytical method they use according to age and gender while periodically updating them to interpret the test results correctly.
More Related Videos
09:53High-Resolution Respirometry to Assess Bioenergetics in Cells and Tissues Using Chamber- and Plate-Based Respirometers
Published on: October 26, 2021
09:16Real-Time Analysis of Bioenergetics in Primary Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Using High-Resolution Respirometry
Published on: February 3, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Protein-Drug Binding: Determination Methods
Indirect methods involve isolating the bound drug from its free form in biological samples such as blood, serum, or plasma. These techniques aim to measure the percentage of drugs bound to proteins. Equilibrium dialysis is a commonly used method where the free drug concentration at equilibrium is measured by separating the bound...
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacokinetic Methods
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation