Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025
3D Printing Model of a Patient's Specific Lumbar Vertebra
Published on: April 14, 2023
Numerical evaluation of spinal reconstruction using a 3D printed vertebral body replacement implant: effects of
Jianfeng Kang1, Yanlong Wu1, Jian Qiao1
1School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, Foshan University, Foshan, China.
Background And Objective:
Artificial vertebral implants have been widely used for functional reconstruction of vertebral defects caused by tumors or trauma. However, the evaluation of their biomechanical properties often neglects the influence of material anisotropy derived from the host bone and implant's microstructures. Hence, this study aims to investigate the effect of material anisotropy on the safety and stability of vertebral reconstruction.
Material And Methods:
Two finite element models were developed to reflect the difference of material properties between linear elastic isotropy and nonlinear anisotropy. Their biomechanical evaluation was carried out under different load conditions including flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. These performances of two models with respect to safety and stability were analyzed and compared quantitatively based on the predicted von Mises stress, displacement and effective strain.
Results:
The maximum von Mises stress of each component in both models was lower than the yield strength of respective material, while the predicted results of nonlinear anisotropic model were generally below to those of the linear elastic isotropic model. Furthermore, the maximum von Mises stress of natural vertebra and reconstructed system was decreased by 2-37 MPa and 20-61 MPa, respectively. The maximum reductions for the translation displacement of the artificial vertebral body implant and motion range of whole model were reached to 0.26 mm and 0.77°. The percentage of effective strain elements on the superior and inferior endplates adjacent to implant was diminished by up to 19.7% and 23.1%, respectively.
Conclusion:
After comprehensive comparison, these results indicated that the finite element model with the assumption of linear elastic isotropy may underestimate the safety of the reconstruction system, while misdiagnose higher stability by overestimating the range of motion and bone growth capability.
