Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2025

Proteomics to Identify Proteins Interacting with P2X2 Ligand-Gated Cation Channels
Published on: May 18, 2009
Transcriptome-Derived Ligand-Receptor Interactome of Major PitNET Subgroups
Sai Batchu1, Michael Joseph Diaz2, Aashay Patel2
1Cooper Medical School, Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, United States.
Abstract:
Introduction Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are rare skull base tumors which can impart significant disability owing to their locally invasive potential. To date, the gamut of PitNET subtypes remains ill-understood at the ligand-receptor (LR) interactome level, potentially limiting therapeutic options. Here, we present findings from in silico analysis of LR complexes formed by PitNETs with clinical presentations of acromegaly, Cushing's disease, high prolactin production, and without symptoms of hormone hypersecretion. Methods Previously published PitNET gene expression data was acquired from ArrayExpress. These data represented all secretion types. LR interactions were analyzed via a crosstalk score approach. Results Cortisol (CORT) ligand was significantly involved in tumor-to-tumor signaling across all PitNET subtypes but prolactinomas, which evidenced active CORT depletion. Likewise, CCL25 ligand was implicated in 20% of the top LR complex interactions along the tumor-to-stroma signaling axis, but silent PitNETs reported unique depletion of the CCL25 ligand. Along the stroma-to-tumor signaling axis, all clinical PitNET subtypes enriched stromal vasoactive intestinal polypeptide ligand interactions with tumor secretin receptor. All clinical PitNET subtypes enriched stromal DEFB103B (human β-defensin 103B) ligand interactions with stromal chemokine receptors along the stroma-to-stroma signaling axis. In PitNETs causing Cushing's disease, immune checkpoint ligand CD274 reported high stromal expression, and prolactinomas reported low stromal expression. Moreover, prolactinomas evidenced distinctly high stromal expression of immune-exhausted T cell response marker IL10RA compared with other clinical subtypes. Conclusion Relative crosstalk score analysis revealed a great diversity of LR complex interactions across clinical PitNET subtypes and between solid tumor compartments. More data are needed to validate these findings and exact clinical importance.
More Related Videos
10:51Reverse Yeast Two-hybrid System to Identify Mammalian Nuclear Receptor Residues that Interact with Ligands and/or Antagonists
Published on: November 15, 2013
06:01Extracellular Protein Microarray Technology for High Throughput Detection of Low Affinity Receptor-Ligand Interactions
Published on: January 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Protein-protein Interfaces
Ligand Binding and Linkage
Assembly of Signaling Complexes
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...