The use of postoperative calibrations in Hirschsprung disease: a practice to reconsider?

Federico Beati1, Tommaso D'Angelo1, Chiara Iacusso1

  • 1Neonatal Surgery Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza S Onofrio 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.

Insights

Discontinuing daily anal dilations after endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease (HD) is safe and may reduce enterocolitis and constipation. This approach offers a feasible alternative to traditional postoperative care.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Gastroenterology
  • Colorectal Surgery

Background:

  • Daily postoperative anal dilations are a common practice after transanal endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease (HD).
  • The risks and effectiveness of this traditional approach require further evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the potential risks and effectiveness of a new protocol omitting daily postoperative anal dilations.
  • To compare outcomes between a non-dilation protocol and traditional dilation post-HD surgery.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study compared infants (<6 months) undergoing transanal endorectal pull-through.
  • Group A (non-dilation) was compared 1:2 to Group B (daily dilations), matched for age and colonic segment.
  • Exclusion criteria included associated syndromes, extended aganglionosis, and enterostomy.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in anastomotic complications (stenosis, leakage) were observed between groups.
  • Group A showed a significantly lower incidence of enterocolitis (p=0.03) and constipation (p=0.02).

Conclusions:

  • A non-dilation strategy after endorectal pull-through for HD is a feasible alternative.
  • This approach does not increase anastomotic complication risks and may reduce enterocolitis and constipation.
Abstract