Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026

Dried Blood Spots - Preparing and Processing for Use in Immunoassays and in Molecular Techniques
Published on: March 13, 2015
Pilot postal birth cohort hepatitis C virus screening in UK primary care: HepCAPP study
Ruth Simmons1, Annabel A Powell1, Samreen Ijaz1
1UK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
Insights
Birth cohort screening for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) using oral swabs had low uptake and high costs. This method is not recommended for primary care in England due to poor yield compared to targeted screening.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Public Health
- Screening Programs
Background:
- Birth cohort screening aims to find undiagnosed chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in populations.
- Traditional targeted approaches may miss individuals with HCV.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess uptake of HCV antibody testing via oral swab screening.
- To determine the yield, risk marker prevalence, and cost-effectiveness of this screening method.
Main Methods:
- Pilot study conducted in general practices across England.
- Participants received postal oral swab kits for HCV antibody testing.
- Saliva samples were analyzed for HCV antibodies.
Main Results:
- 16.7% consented, 12.4% returned kits; 0.03% tested positive for HCV antibodies.
- Only 45% of positive cases had documented HCV risk markers.
- Cost per case detected was significantly higher than estimated, with 2 RNA-positive cases identified.
Conclusions:
- While feasible, birth cohort screening via oral swabs is less cost-effective than targeted screening for HCV.
- The yield and cost per case were worse than projected, making it unsuitable for primary care rollout in England.
Background:
Birth cohort screening has been implemented in some countries to identify the potentially 'missed population' of people with undiagnosed chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) who may not be found through targeted approaches.
Aim:
To determine uptake of HCV antibody testing using an oral swab screening method, the overall yield, whether those testing positive had risk markers in their primary care record, and the cost per case detected.
Design And Setting:
This was a pilot screening study set in general practices in the Southwest of England, Yorkshire and Humber, and South London.
Method:
Participants consenting were sent an oral swab kit in the post and saliva samples were tested for antibodies to HCV.
Results:
In total, 16 436/98 396 (16.7%) patients consented and were sent an oral swab kit. Of these, 12 216 (12.4%) returned a kit, with 31 participants (yield 0.03%) testing positive for HCV antibodies. Of those positive, 14/35 (45%) had a risk marker for HCV on their primary care record. Two (yield 0.002%) were confirmed RNA positive and referred for treatment, both had HCV risk markers. The cost per case was £16 000 per HCV antibody detected and £247 997 per chronic HCV detected.
Conclusion:
Wide-scale screening could be delivered and identify people infected with HCV, however, most of these individuals could have been detected through lower-cost targeted screening. The yield and cost per case found in patients were substantially worse than model estimates and targeted screening studies. Birth cohort screening should not be rolled out in primary care in England.
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Hepatitis
Viral Hepatitis I: Introduction

