Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does size matter? Expectations and limitations in imaging diagnosis of deep endometriosis?

Fertility and sterility·2026
Same author

Do MRI radiomic models truly generalize? External validation of three studies in parotid lesion characterization.

European radiology·2026
Same author

Professional practice guidelines: eco-responsible optimization of choice and use of drugs and medical devices in operating theaters or interventional sector.

Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine·2026
Same author

A Köppen-Geiger classification derivative tailored for numerical modeling of ecosystems within watershed dynamics.

The Science of the total environment·2026
Same author

Blinatumomab after R-CHOP bridging therapy for patients with Richter transformation: a phase 2 multicentre trial.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

A deep learning-based interactive medical image segmentation framework with sequential memory.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2024
Same journal

Evaluation of the objective structured clinical examination in the assessment of nuclear medicine residency training.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same journal

ECR 2026 Book of Abstracts.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same journal

Assessing the reliability of Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST): a systematic review of the factors contributing to inter-observer variability.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same journal

Slow-flow, high-impact: radiologic features in venous malformations of the female genital tract.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same journal

How to optimise breast cancer staging with contrast-enhanced mammography: current evidence and clinical implications.

Insights into imaging·2026
Same journal

MRI-based quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity for predicting recurrence risk in ER+/HER2- breast cancer.

Insights into imaging·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K

Deep learning CT reconstruction improves liver metastases detection.

Achraf Kanan1, Bruno Pereira2, Constance Hordonneau1

  • 1Department of Radiology, Estaing Hospital, Clermont University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Insights Into Imaging
|July 6, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) significantly improves liver metastases detection compared to standard CT methods. High-strength DLIR identified more liver metastases and enhanced their visibility, aiding oncological management.

Keywords:
Artificial intelligenceComputed tomographyDeep learningImage reconstructionLiver neoplasm

More Related Videos

Dual-phase Cone-beam Computed Tomography to See, Reach, and Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemo-embolization
09:49

Dual-phase Cone-beam Computed Tomography to See, Reach, and Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemo-embolization

Published on: December 2, 2013

10.3K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K
Dual-phase Cone-beam Computed Tomography to See, Reach, and Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemo-embolization
09:49

Dual-phase Cone-beam Computed Tomography to See, Reach, and Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemo-embolization

Published on: December 2, 2013

10.3K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology and Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Accurate detection of liver metastases is critical for effective cancer treatment planning.
  • Standard computed tomography (CT) reconstructions have limitations in visualizing small liver lesions.
  • Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) offers potential for improved image quality and lesion detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of DLIR on the number of detected liver metastases.
  • To compare the conspicuity and visibility of liver metastases between DLIR and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V).

Main Methods:

  • 121 patients with liver metastases underwent CT scans reconstructed with ASiR-V and three DLIR levels (low, medium, high).
  • Two radiologists independently counted metastases (max 10 per patient) and assessed visibility and contour definition.
  • Statistical comparisons were made using mixed models.

Main Results:

  • DLIR-high significantly increased the number of detected liver metastases compared to ASiR-V and lower DLIR settings (p < 0.001).
  • Increased detection by DLIR-high was confirmed by a third reader in 10 patients.
  • Metastases visibility and contour definition were superior with DLIR compared to ASiR-V.

Conclusions:

  • High-strength DLIR enhances liver metastases detection and visibility over conventional CT reconstruction.
  • DLIR is a promising tool for improving hepatic metastases staging and follow-up in clinical oncology.
  • DLIR effectively overcomes limitations of standard CT in detecting liver metastases.