Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2025

09:39
Spatial Temporal Analysis of Fieldwise Flow in Microvasculature
Published on: November 18, 2019
5.8K
Intrasaccular Flow Disruption: Examining Global Access and Research Trends
Shray A Patel1, Juan Vivanco-Suarez2, Chandrasekhar Palepu2
1Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
World Neurosurgery
|July 7, 2024
Summary
Bibliometric analysis reveals the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device dominates intracranial aneurysm treatment research, with higher citations and collaboration than newer intrasaccular flow disruptors. European and North American institutions lead research output, with limited African contributions.
Area of Science:
- Neuroendovascular therapy
- Bibliometrics
- Medical device research
Background:
- Intracranial aneurysms pose significant risks, necessitating effective treatment options.
- Intrasaccular flow disruptors, including the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device, have emerged as promising therapeutic tools.
- Bibliometric analysis offers insights into research trends and productivity in emerging medical fields.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a bibliometric analysis of research on the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) and other intrasaccular flow disruptors for intracranial aneurysms.
- To identify trends in publication, citation, study design, and international collaboration.
- To provide a roadmap for future research in this domain.
Main Methods:
- Systematic assessment of bibliometric data for top-cited articles on WEB and other intrasaccular devices.
- Analysis included citations, journals, study designs, open access status, and multi-institutional involvement.
- Comparison of citation metrics and collaboration patterns between WEB and other devices.
Main Results:
- The top 100 cited WEB studies received significantly more citations (mean 35.6) than studies on other intrasaccular devices (mean 4.24).
- France led WEB publications, while Germany led for other disruptors; no senior authors from Africa were identified.
- WEB research demonstrated higher mean citations per year and a greater proportion of multi-institutional collaborations compared to other devices.
Conclusions:
- Research on the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) is more established and highly cited than for newer intrasaccular devices.
- Study designs remain consistent, but leading countries for WEB research are not necessarily pioneering newer devices.
- There is a notable concentration of research in Europe and North America, with limited global contribution.
Keywords:
BibliometricContourEndovascularIntracranial aneurysmIntrasaccular deviceLunaWoven EndoBridge
