Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
Published on: December 15, 2023
Proposal of reference value for day-to-day blood pressure variability based on two outcomes: the Ohasama study
Michihiro Satoh1,2,3, Hirohito Metoki1,2,4, Masahiro Kikuya2,5
1Division of Public Health, Hygiene and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University.
Background:
This study aimed to propose reference values for day-to-day home blood pressure (BP) variability that align with the established hypertension threshold of home BP for the risk of two different outcomes: cardiovascular mortality and cognitive decline.
Methods:
This prospective study was conducted in Ohasama town, Japan, with 1212 participants assessed for cardiovascular mortality risk (age: 64.7 years, 33.6% men). Additionally, 678 participants (age: 62.7 years, 31.1% men) were assessed for cognitive decline risk (Mini-Mental Scale Examination score <24). The within-individual coefficient of variation (CV) of home morning SBP (HSBP) was used as the index of day-to-day BP variability (%). Adjusted Cox regression models were used to estimate the HSBP-CV values, which provided the 10-year outcome risk at an HSBP of 135 mmHg.
Results:
A total of 114 cardiovascular deaths and 85 events of cognitive decline (mean follow-up:13.9 and 9.6 years, respectively) were identified. HSBP and HSBP-CV were associated with increased risks for both outcomes, with adjusted hazard ratios per 1-standard deviation increase of at least 1.25 for cardiovascular mortality and at least 1.30 for cognitive decline, respectively. The adjusted 10-year risks for cardiovascular mortality and cognitive decline were 1.67 and 8.83%, respectively, for an HSBP of 135 mmHg. These risk values were observed when the HSBP-CV was 8.44% and 8.53%, respectively.
Conclusion:
The HSBP-CV values indicating the 10-year risk of cardiovascular mortality or cognitive decline at an HSBP of 135 mmHg were consistent, at approximately 8.5%. This reference value will be useful for risk stratification in clinical practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...

