Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

miR-27a-3p Upregulation and Netrin-1 Deficiency Drive Inflammatory Responses and Nerve Degeneration in Patients With Diabetes.

European journal of neurology·2025
Same author

The Amelioration of Detrimental Biochemical Anomalies by Supplementing B, C, and E Vitamins in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus May Reduce the Rate of Development of Diabetic Retinopathy.

Journal of diabetes research·2022
Same author

Decreased Levels of miR-126 and miR-132 in Plasma and Vitreous Humor of Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Among Subjects with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy·2022
Same author

Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Anti-VEGF for Treating Diabetic Retinopathy in the Indian Population.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2021
Same author

Two-stage test of means of unordered pairs.

Statistics in medicine·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

2.5K

Statistical Methods for Best and Worst Eye Measurements.

Kaustav Banerjee1, Subhasish Pramanik2, Lakshmi Kanta Mondal3

  • 1Decision Sciences Area, Indian Institute of Management Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226013, India.

Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
|July 8, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Ignoring fellow eye correlation in diabetic retinopathy biomarker studies leads to conservative tests. Utilizing paired Z-tests that account for this correlation improves biomarker detection accuracy.

Keywords:
best eyeunordered pairsworst eye

More Related Videos

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.3K
Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
06:19

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia

Published on: September 27, 2024

208

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

2.5K
Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.3K
Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia
06:19

Comparison of Three Clinical Stereoscopic Methods for Measuring Binocular Visual Function During Amblyopic Treatment in Unilateral Amblyopia

Published on: September 27, 2024

208

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomarker Discovery
  • Statistical Methods

Background:

  • Diabetic retinopathy biomarker research often analyzes 'best' and 'worst' eyes separately.
  • Standard case-control methods using two-sample tests disregard the inherent correlation between fellow eyes.
  • This oversight can lead to inaccurate statistical conclusions in biomarker detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the statistical challenges posed by analyzing fellow eye data in diabetic retinopathy research.
  • To introduce and demonstrate alternative paired statistical tests that account for inter-eye correlation.
  • To evaluate the impact of ignoring versus accounting for fellow eye correlation on biomarker detection.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a case-control dataset of 'best' and 'worst' eye measurements.
  • Compared standard two-sample tests with novel paired Z-tests designed to incorporate fellow eye correlation.
  • Assessed the statistical power and conservativeness of different analytical approaches.

Main Results:

  • Methods ignoring fellow eye correlation produce overly conservative statistical tests.
  • Paired Z-tests that account for inter-eye correlation provide more accurate and powerful results.
  • The choice of control group and correlation adjustment significantly impacts biomarker detection.

Conclusions:

  • Properly accounting for the correlation between fellow eyes is crucial for accurate biomarker detection in diabetic retinopathy.
  • Ignoring this correlation can lead to missed opportunities in identifying predictive markers.
  • Selecting appropriate statistical methods and control groups is essential for robust research findings.