A Multi-center Cross-Sectional Assessment of Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward...

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially avoidable condition that affects hospitalized patients. Risk stratification and preventative strategies have substantial evidence supporting their use, but reasons hinder widespread adoption, compliance, and success, explaining the continuation of VTE. Thromboprophylaxis consists of several measures that are frequently adopted to avoid the complications of VTE. The study evaluated knowledge, attitude, and practice toward using thromboprophylaxis by health professionals. Methods This multi-center cross-sectional study was carried out on health professionals involved in patient care working in various secondary and tertiary hospitals in the study region between October 2023 and February 2024. A previously published questionnaire was sent in the form of an online survey to the study participants. Fifteen, ten, and nine questions evaluated the participants' knowledge, attitude, and practice of thromboprophylaxis, respectively. The study followed the checklist for reporting results of the Internet E-survey (CHERRIES) guidelines. Frequency and percentages were calculated. Bi-variable and multi-variable logistic regression were carried out and presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results Of the 219 participants, 115 (52.5%) and 104 (47.5%) were males and females. More than 50.7% were in the age group of >30 years, and the majority of the participants possessed a bachelor's (104 (47.5%)) degree. One hundred seventy-six (80.4%) of the study participants were working in government hospitals, and the majority (112 (51.1%)) were nurses. One hundred sixty-two (74% (67.63-79.65)), 175 (79.9% (73.98-85.01)) and 211 (96.3% (92.93)) had satisfactory knowledge, a positive attitude, and good practice regarding thromboprophylaxis, respectively. Regarding the facility characteristics, 196 (89.5%), 150 (68.5%), and 164 (74.9%) respondents agreed with the availability of a VTE prevention policy, VTE prevention consultants, and the availability of anticoagulants. Eighty (36.5%) participants responded with a 'not availability' of pneumatic compression devices. Of the 15 knowledge questions, the majority (124 (56.6%)) participants faulted the false statements regarding 'patients of DVT being symptomatic' and 119 (54.3%) on the statement that helping patients 'out of bed activity does not prevent VTE'. On multi-variable analysis, participants who were aware of having a VTE prevention policy and availability of anticoagulants were more knowledgeable with adjusted odds ratios of 5.39 (1.88-15.39) and 2.52 (1.12-5.63) respectively. Every practice domain received >90% approval ratings. Conclusions The study concludes that an overall satisfactory knowledge and positive attitude regarding thromboprophylaxis exists among the participants. The study proposes more training sessions on VTE prevention and orientation of health professionals on the availability of VTE policy guidelines and facility availability of resources for thromboprophylaxis.