Randomized Controlled Trial of Enteral Vitamin D Supplementation (ViDES) in Infants <28 Weeks Gestational Age or

Mar Romero-Lopez1, Jon E Tyson1, Mamta Naik2

  • 1The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston.

Research Square
|July 9, 2024
PubMed

Insights

This study compares two vitamin D supplementation regimens for extremely preterm infants. Higher doses may improve vitamin D levels and reduce respiratory support, aiding infant development.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatology
  • Pediatric Nutrition
  • Endocrinology

Background:

  • Vitamin D is crucial for infant organ development, particularly lungs.
  • Extremely preterm infants (<28 weeks gestation) often have low vitamin D at birth and limited intake.
  • Current vitamin D supplementation guidelines for these infants are debated, with unclear effects on outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the effectiveness of two enteral vitamin D supplementation regimens in extremely preterm infants.
  • To determine if higher early vitamin D doses increase serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels and improve respiratory outcomes.
  • To evaluate the impact of different regimens on neurodevelopmental outcomes up to 2 years corrected age.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized, blinded comparative effectiveness trial involving infants <28 weeks gestation or <1000g birth weight.
  • Infants received either routine (400 IU/day) or increased (800 IU/day) vitamin D supplementation for the first 28 days.
  • Outcomes measured include serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels, respiratory support needs, and neurodevelopmental assessments.

Main Results:

  • The study hypothesizes that the 800 IU/day regimen will significantly increase vitamin D levels compared to the 400 IU/day regimen.
  • The higher dose is also predicted to reduce the need for respiratory support at 36 weeks postmenstrual age.
  • Bayesian analyses provide high power to detect these anticipated differences.

Conclusions:

  • This trial aims to clarify the relationship between vitamin D supplementation and clinical outcomes in extremely preterm infants.
  • Findings could lead to revised supplementation guidelines for this vulnerable population.
  • Results may support a larger multicenter study to confirm generalizability.
Abstract