Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards.

J H Wasson, H C Sox, R K Neff

The New England Journal of Medicine

|September 26, 1985

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[Registration of clinical trials: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde·2004

Same author

Commentary of "Hospitalists and the doctor-patient relationship".

The Journal of legal studies·2003

Same author

[Sponsorship, authorship and accountability].

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2002

Same author

Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2002

Same author

A frequently used patient and physician-directed educational intervention does nothing to improve primary care of prostate conditions.

Urology·2001

Same author

Treatments for prostate cancer in older men: 1984-1997.

Urology·2001

Same journal

Sparganosis.

The New England journal of medicine·2026

Same journal

Caring for an Aging America - The Looming Crisis of the Long-Term-Care Workforce.

The New England journal of medicine·2026

Same journal

For Those Left Behind.

The New England journal of medicine·2026

Same journal

Colliding Forces - The Aging of the Baby Boom Generation and Contracting Nursing-Home Supply.

The New England journal of medicine·2026

Same journal

Mandated State-Level Surveillance of Assisted Reproductive Technology - An Emerging Threat in the United States.

The New England journal of medicine·2026

Same journal

Ebola at 50 - Lessons for Outbreak Response and Preparedness.

The New England journal of medicine·2026

See all related articles

Clinical prediction rules aid medical decisions but require rigorous evaluation. Many studies lack adequate reporting on rule applicability, patient data, and clinical impact, hindering effective use.

Area of Science:

Medical Informatics
Clinical Epidemiology
Decision Support Systems

Background:

Clinical prediction rules aim to reduce medical uncertainty by guiding diagnostic and treatment decisions.
These rules are derived from systematic clinical observations to aid physicians in patient management.
Evaluating the applicability of prediction rules to specific patient populations is crucial before adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

To outline methodological standards for assessing the suitability of clinical prediction rules for clinical practice.
To evaluate the quality of reporting in studies developing clinical prediction rules based on established standards.

Main Methods:

A review of 33 reports on clinical prediction rules was conducted.
Methodological standards were applied to assess the description of rules, patient cohorts, and clinical settings.

Related Experiment Videos

The assessment also focused on the reporting of misclassification rates and the impact on patient care.

Main Results:

Only 42% of the reviewed reports adequately described the prediction rules, patients, and clinical settings.
Misclassification rates were reported in just 34% of the studies.
The impact of the prediction rules on patient care was documented in a mere 6% of the reports.

Conclusions:

Many clinical prediction rule studies lack sufficient methodological rigor and comprehensive reporting.
Adherence to basic principles of study design is essential for authors and readers to maximize the utility of clinical prediction rules.
Improved reporting standards are needed to ensure the reliable application and effectiveness of clinical prediction rules in healthcare.