Related Experiment Video For Cholecystitis
Updated: Jun 21, 2025
Dual-phase Cone-beam Computed Tomography to See, Reach, and Treat Hepatocellular Carcinoma during Drug-eluting Beads Transarterial Chemo-embolization
Published on: December 2, 2013
Dual-energy CT in differentiating benign gallbladder wall thickening from wall thickening type of gallbladder cancer
Kakivaya Pavankumar Reddy1, Pankaj Gupta2, Ajay Gulati1
1Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Objective:
To evaluate the performance of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in differentiating non-acute benign from malignant gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT).
Methods:
This prospective study comprised consecutive adults with GBWT who underwent late arterial phase (LAP) and portal venous phase (PVP) DECT between January 2022 and May 2023. The final diagnosis was based on histopathology or 3-6 months follow-up imaging. DECT images in LAP and PVP were assessed independently by two radiologists. The demographic, qualitative, and quantitative parameters were compared between two groups Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the association between the aforementioned factors and malignant GBWT.
Results:
Seventy-five patients (mean age 56 ± 12.8 years, 46 females) were included. Forty-two patients had benign, and 33 had malignant GBWT. In the overall group, female gender (p = 0.018), lymphadenopathy (p = 0.011), and omental nodules (p = 0.044) were significantly associated with malignant GBWT. None of the DECT features differed significantly between benign and malignant GBWT in overall group. In the xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC, n = 9) vs. gallbladder cancer (GBC) (n = 33) subgroup, mean attenuation value at 140 keV LAP VMI was significantly associated with malignant GBWT [p = 0.023, area under curve 0.759 (95%CI 0.599-0.919)].
Conclusion:
DECT-generated quantitative parameters do not add value in differentiating non-acute benign from malignant GBWT. However, DECT may have a role in differentiating XGC from GBC in a selected subgroup of patients. Further, larger studies may be necessary to confirm these findings.
Clinical Relevance Statement:
In patients with non-acute gallbladder wall thickening in whom there is suspicion of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis (XGC), DECT findings may allow differentiation of XGC from wall thickening type of gallbladder cancer.
Key Points:
Differentiation of benign and malignant gallbladder wall thickening (GBWT) at CT is challenging. Quantitative dual energy CT (DECT) features do not provide additional value in differentiating benign and malignant GBWT. DECT may be helpful in a subgroup of patients to differentiate xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis from gallbladder cancer.
