Long-term consequences of positive surgical margin after partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: multi-institutional analysis
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Positive surgical margins (PSM) after nephrectomy increase recurrence rates but do not significantly impact overall survival in kidney cancer patients, even after accounting for biases.
Area Of Science
- Urology
- Oncology
- Nephrology
Background
- Positive surgical margins (PSM) are a concern after nephrectomy (PN) for localized renal tumors.
- Understanding the long-term impact of PSM on recurrence and survival is crucial for patient management.
Purpose Of The Study
- To determine the very long-term impact of positive surgical margins (PSM) after nephrectomy (PN) on recurrence in a contemporary cohort.
- To assess disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with and without PSM.
Main Methods
- Retrospective analysis of 1115 patients who underwent PN for localized renal tumors.
- Stratification based on the presence or absence of PSM.
- Kaplan-Meier analysis for DFS and OS, with log-rank tests for comparisons. Propensity score analysis was used for sensitivity analyses.
Main Results
- The incidence of PSM was 5.4%. Recurrence rates were significantly higher in the PSM group (13%) compared to the no-SM group (7%) (p=0.05).
- Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly reduced in the PSM group (p=0.004), especially for clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
- While initial analysis showed lower OS in the PSM group, propensity score analysis revealed no significant difference in OS (p=0.49) but confirmed reduced DFS (p=0.05).
Conclusions
- Positive surgical margins after nephrectomy are associated with increased recurrence rates.
- Despite increased recurrence, PSM did not significantly impact overall survival after accounting for potential biases.
- These findings highlight the importance of margin status in predicting recurrence after nephrectomy for renal tumors.

