Counterfactual Causal-Effect Intervention for Interpretable Medical Visual Question Answering
Abstract:
Medical Visual Question Answering (VQA-Med) is a challenging task that involves answering clinical questions related to medical images. However, most current VQA-Med methods ignore the causal correlation between specific lesion or abnormality features and answers, while also failing to provide accurate explanations for their decisions. To explore the interpretability of VQA-Med, this paper proposes a novel CCIS-MVQA model for VQA-Med based on a counterfactual causal-effect intervention strategy. This model consists of the modified ResNet for image feature extraction, a GloVe decoder for question feature extraction, a bilinear attention network for vision and language feature fusion, and an interpretability generator for producing the interpretability and prediction results. The proposed CCIS-MVQA introduces a layer-wise relevance propagation method to automatically generate counterfactual samples. Additionally, CCIS-MVQA applies counterfactual causal reasoning throughout the training phase to enhance interpretability and generalization. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets show that the proposed CCIS-MVQA model outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. Enough visualization results are produced to analyze the interpretability and performance of CCIS-MVQA.
More Related Videos
03:14Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
Published on: December 6, 2024
07:12Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
Published on: April 11, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Blinding
Blind Procedures
What is an Experiment?
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Cochran's Q Test
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
