Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Ring Annuloplasty During Mitral Valve Surgery Versus Mitral Valve Surgery Alone: A...

Although current guidelines recommend concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty for moderate or greater tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and/or dilated annulus, there remains significant variation in undertaking concomitant tricuspid valve surgery (TVA) across different centres. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of concomitant tricuspid valve surgery for patients with moderate or greater TR and/or dilated annulus at the time of mitral valve (MV) surgery.

A systematic review of the literature using six databases. Eligible studies include comparative studies on TVA concomitant with MV surgery versus MV surgery alone. A meta-analysis was performed on studies reporting outcomes of interest to quantify the effects of concomitant tricuspid ring annuloplasty.

Two randomised controlled trials and six cohort studies were included in the analysis. 1,941 patients were included in the analysis, of whom, 1,090 underwent concomitant TVA and 851 underwent MV surgery alone. Pooled analysis demonstrated that there was less progression of moderate/severe TR in the concomitant group (3.0% vs 9.6%; odds ratio [OR] 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.55; p=0.0001). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (3.0% vs 3.8%; OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.47-1.34; p=0.38). The rate of permanent pacemaker implantation was higher in the concomitant group although this did not reach statistical significance (7.6% vs 5.3%; OR 1.30; 95% CI 0.85-1.98; p=0.23). Cardiopulmonary bypass was longer in the concomitant TVA group by 20 minutes (mean difference 13.9-26.0; p<0.00001).

Our study demonstrated that concomitant tricuspid ring annuloplasty at the time of MV surgery is associated with a significantly lower rate of TR progression without increasing the operative mortality. There is a trend towards a higher permanent pacemaker implantation rate although this did not reach statistical significance.