Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.2K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.2K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies
  1. Home
  3. How Is Your Feedback Perceived? An Experimental Study Of Anticipated And Delayed Conversational Feedback.
  1. Home
  3. How Is Your Feedback Perceived? An Experimental Study Of Anticipated And Delayed Conversational Feedback.

Related Experiment Video

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

689

How is your feedback perceived? An experimental study of anticipated and delayed conversational feedback.

Auriane Boudin1,2,3, Stéphane Rauzy1,3, Roxane Bertrand1,3

  • 1Aix Marseille Univ, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire Parole et Langage, Aix-en-Provence, France.

JASA Express Letters
|July 10, 2024

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Feedback timing affects listener engagement, with delays over 1 second decreasing it. However, feedback acceptability remains high even with significant timing shifts in conversations.

More Related Videos

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

33.9K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.4K

Related Experiment Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

689
Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

33.9K
Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.4K

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Conversational Analysis

Background:

  • Understanding the nuances of conversational feedback is crucial for effective human interaction.
  • The timing of listener feedback significantly influences its perceived naturalness and acceptability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how manipulating feedback timing (anticipation and delay) impacts its acceptability and perceived listener engagement.
  • To determine the temporal thresholds for acceptable and engaging feedback in spontaneous dialogues.

Main Methods:

  • Extracted dialog sequences from spontaneous conversations.
  • Manipulated listener feedback timing, advancing it up to 1.5 seconds or delaying it up to 2 seconds.
  • Collected participant ratings on feedback acceptability and listener engagement.

Main Results:

  • Feedback remained acceptable in 76% of manipulated instances, irrespective of timing.
  • Listener engagement significantly decreased when feedback was delayed by more than 1 second.
  • No consistent effect of feedback anticipation on acceptability or engagement was observed.

Conclusions:

  • While feedback remains largely acceptable, its timing is critical for maintaining listener engagement.
  • Delayed feedback, particularly beyond 1 second, negatively impacts conversational dynamics.
  • Anticipated feedback does not appear to affect perception in the tested range, suggesting different processing mechanisms.