Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Small Animal Bone Compression Testing for Research
Published on: December 1, 2023
Elastic response of trabecular bone under compression calculated using the firm and floppy boundary lattice element
Mahsa Zojaji1, Keyvan Ferasat2, McKinley Van Klei1
1Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Smith Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Health Innovation, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
None:
Micro-Finite Element analysis (μFEA) has become widely used in biomechanical research as a reliable tool for the prediction of bone mechanical properties within its microstructure such as apparent elastic modulus and strength. However, this method requires substantial computational resources and processing time. Here, we propose a computationally efficient alternative to FEA that can provide an accurate estimation of bone trabecular mechanical properties in a fast and quantitative way. A lattice element method (LEM) framework based on the Large-scale Atomic/Molecular Massively Parallel Simulator (LAMMPS) open-source software package is employed to calculate the elastic response of trabecular bone cores. A novel procedure to handle pore-material boundaries is presented, referred to as the Firm and Floppy Boundary LEM (FFB-LEM). Our FFB-LEM calculations are compared to voxel- and geometry-based FEA benchmarks incorporating bovine and human trabecular bone cores imaged by micro Computed Tomography (μCT). Using 14 computer cores, the apparent elastic modulus calculation of a trabecular bone core from a μCT-based input with FFB-LEM required about 15 min, including conversion of the μCT data into a LAMMPS input file. In contrast, the FEA calculations on the same system including the mesh generation, required approximately 30 and 50 min for voxel- and geometry-based FEA, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between FFB-LEM and voxel- or geometry-based FEA apparent elastic moduli (+24.3% or +7.41%, and +0.630% or -5.29% differences for bovine and human samples, respectively).
More Related Videos
11:28A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
07:09In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Relation between Poisson's ratio, Modulus of Elasticity and Modulus of Rigidity
Spongy Bone
Spongy bone is more porous, and less dense compared to compact bone. It is composed of concentric lamellae that are arranged irregularly to form the trabecular network. In some bones, the spaces between trabeculae contain red marrow, where...
Members Made of Elastoplastic Material
As the bending moment...
Elastic Curve from the Load Distribution
For all beams, the analysis of the beam's reaction to distributed loads begins by understanding the relationship between a beam's load and the resulting shear forces and bending moments.
Bending of Members Made of Several Materials
Hooke's Law determines stress in each material, stating that stress is proportional to strain but varies due to each...
Method of Sections: Problem Solving II