Comparison of the benefits and risks of hemihepatic inflow occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Application of hemihepatic inflow occlusion (HIO) and total hepatic inflow occlusion (TIO) are two common approaches for hepatectomy. However, their efficacy and safety remain controversial.

Randomized control trials (RCTs) published before 15t January 2023 were included by a systematic literature search, which compared the clinical outcomes between HIO and TIO. The primary outcome was the estimated blood loss (EBL). Three independent authors screened and extracted the data and resolved disagreements by consensus. The ROB2.0 tool was used for evaluating the risk of bias.

A total of 1026 patients (511 TIO and 515 HIO) from 9 studies were analyzed in the meta-analyses. The EBL between TIO and HIO group was similar, while HIO was associated with a lower proportion of patients required transfusion (P=0.002), less units of blood transferred (P<0.001) and a lower overall complication rate (P=0.008). There were no significant differences between TIO and HIO in mortality (P=0.37), length of stay (P=0.97), bile leak rate (P=0.58), liver failure rate (P=0.96), reoperation rate (P=0.48), postoperative haemorrhage rate (P=0.93) and incidence of postoperative ascites (P=0.96). The operative time of HIO was usually no more than 15 min longer than that of TIO (P<0.001).

Comparing with the TIO, HIO increased the operative time and failed to further reduce the EBL in patients with liver surgery. However, despite the complexity of the operation, HIO was recommended due to the similar effect on the consumption of blood products and the postoperative complications.