Using science communication research to practice iterative engagement in collaborative nutrient management

Area of Science:

• Environmental science
• Science communication
• Collaborative research

Background:

• Transdisciplinary environmental research requires effective science communication.
• A pilot project in Cape Cod addressed excess nutrient management.
• This study evaluates the science communication strategies used.

Purpose of the Study:

• To evaluate an innovative science communication approach.
• To identify key components of effective science communication evaluation.
• To improve collaborator engagement in environmental research.

Main Methods:

• A four-year pilot project on nutrient management in Cape Cod.
• Mid- and end-of-project interviews with researchers and partners.
• Reflection from the lead science communication researcher.

Main Results:

• Effective science communication evaluation must be adaptive, multistage, holistic, objective-based, democratic, and reflexive.
• Formative and end-of-project evaluations enhance engagement.
• Evaluation improved the fulfillment of all collaborators' needs.

Conclusions:

• Adaptive and democratic evaluation methods are vital for successful transdisciplinary research.
• Continuous evaluation fosters better collaboration and outcomes.
• Science communication evaluation directly impacts research project success.