Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Optimal door-to-balloon time for primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Samuel Ji Quan Koh1, Yilin Jiang1, Yee How Lau1
1National Heart Centre Singapore, Cardiology, Singapore.
Insights
Door-to-balloon time (DTBT) significantly impacts ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) outcomes, especially in Killip IV patients. For Killip I-III patients, DTBT showed no significant impact on outcomes after adjustment for confounders.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Door-to-balloon time (DTBT) is a critical metric for assessing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- Optimizing DTBT is crucial for improving patient outcomes following acute myocardial infarction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of DTBT on mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI.
- To analyze the association between DTBT and outcomes stratified by Killip class.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 13,823 STEMI patients undergoing PPCI from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry (2007-2019).
- Patients were stratified by DTBT (≤60 min, 61-90 min, 91-180 min) and Killip status (I-III vs. IV).
- Outcomes included 30-day and 1-year all-cause mortality and MACE, analyzed using multivariate regression.
Main Results:
- In Killip I-III patients, no significant difference in outcomes was observed across different DTBT groups after multivariate analysis.
- For Killip IV patients, a DTBT of 91-180 min was an independent predictor of worse 30-day and 1-year outcomes.
- No significant difference in outcomes was found between DTBT ≤60 min and 61-90 min for Killip IV patients.
Conclusions:
- DTBT does not significantly impact outcomes in Killip I-III STEMI patients when adjusted for confounders.
- For Killip IV patients, prolonged DTBT (>90 min) is associated with adverse outcomes, highlighting the need for timely intervention in this high-risk group.
- The complex interplay of factors influencing STEMI outcomes suggests that recommendations for a universally lowered DTBT (≤60 min) require further evaluation.
Background:
Door-to-balloon time (DTBT) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a performance metric by which primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) services are assessed.
Methods:
Consecutive patients presenting with STEMI undergoing PPCI between January 2007 to December 2019 from the Singapore Myocardial Infarction Registry were included. Patients were stratified based on DTBT (≤60 min, 61-90 min, 91-180 min) and Killip status (I-III vs. IV). Outcomes assessed included all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30-days and 1-year.
Results:
In total, 13,823 patients were included, with 82.59% achieving DTBT ≤90 min and 49.77% achieving DTBT ≤60 min. For Killip I-III (n = 11,591,83.85%), the median DTBT was 60[46-78]min. The 30-day all-cause mortality for DTBT of ≤60 min, 61-90 min and 91-180 min was 1.08%, 2.17% and 4.33% respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, however, there was no significant difference for 30-day and 1-year outcomes across all DTBT (p > 0.05). For Killip IV, the median DTBT was 68[51-91]min. The 30-day all-cause mortality for DTBT of ≤60 min, 61-90 min and 91-180 min was 11.74%, 20.48% and 35.06% respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis for 30-day and 1-year outcomes, DTBT 91-180 min was an independent predictor of worse outcomes (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between DTBT of ≤60 min and 61-90 min (p > 0.05).
Conclusion:
In Killip I-III patients, DTBT had no significant impact on outcomes upon adjustment for confounders. Conversely, for Killip IV patients, a DTBT of >90 min was associated with significantly higher adverse outcomes, with no differences between a DTBT of ≤60 min vs. 61-90 min. Outcomes in STEMI involve a complex interplay of factors and recommendations of a lowered DTBT of ≤60 min will require further evaluation.
More Related Videos
09:21Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
05:41Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Ligation for Ischemia-Reperfusion Research: Model Improvement via Technical Modifications and Quality Control
Published on: December 16, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care