Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Observational study of missing SOFA score data frequency in RCTs relative to ICU length of stay
Denise Molinnus1, Michael Beulertz2, Johannes Bickenbach2
1Department of Intensive Care Medicine. Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. dmolinnus@ukaachen.de.
Abstract:
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, also known as SOFA score, was introduced to assess organ dysfunction of critical ill patients. However, understanding the impact of missing SOFA scores in randomized controlled trials and how this affect the validity and applicability of the SOFA score as a surrogate endpoint for predicting mortality has been a matter of interest. To address this, a secondary analysis of a systematic review was conducted to quantify the relationship between SOFA scores and the prediction of mortality in critically ill adults in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The systematic review being referred to included 87 RCTs with a total of 12,064 critically ill patients. This analysis focused on missing SOFA score data in relation to the length of stay on the intensive care unit (ICU) and the methods used to handle missing data. SOFA score measurements from the included studies were categorized into three time frames: Early (t ≤ 4 days), Intermediate (t = 5-10 days) and Late (t > 10 days) measurement. Only one study reported a complete data set for calculating the SOFA score for an Early measurement. When considering all methods used to address missing data, 32% of studies still had missing data for Early measurements, and this percentage increased to 64% for Late measurements. These findings suggested that, over time, the number of studies with incomplete data sets has been increasing. The longer a patient is treated on the ICU, the higher the number of missing data which can impact the validity of SOFA score analyses. There was no clear trend towards a specific method for compensating missing data. An exemplary calculation demonstrated that ignoring missing data may lead to an underestimated variability of the treatment effect. This, in turn, could bias the interpretation of study results by policy- and clinical decision-makers. Overall, there are several limitations that need to be considered when using SOFA score as a surrogate endpoint for mortality. When employed as an outcome, the SOFA score is frequently missing and most studies do not adequately describe the amount or nature of missing data, or the methods used to handle missing data in the analysis.
Insights
Missing Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores in clinical trials are common, especially with longer intensive care unit stays. Incomplete data can impact mortality prediction validity.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is crucial for assessing organ dysfunction in critically ill patients.
- The validity and applicability of SOFA scores as a surrogate endpoint for mortality prediction are questioned due to missing data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a secondary analysis of a systematic review to quantify the relationship between SOFA scores and mortality prediction in critically ill adults within RCTs.
- To investigate the impact of missing SOFA score data, focusing on length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and data imputation methods.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of a systematic review including 87 RCTs with 12,064 critically ill patients.
- SOFA score measurements categorized into Early (≤4 days), Intermediate (5-10 days), and Late (>10 days).
- Analysis of missing data percentages and handling methods across different time frames.
Main Results:
- Only one study reported complete early SOFA score data; 32% of studies had missing early data, rising to 64% for late measurements.
- Increasing ICU length of stay correlated with a higher incidence of missing SOFA score data.
- No consistent trend in methods for handling missing data was observed; ignoring missing data may underestimate treatment effect variability.
Conclusions:
- Missing SOFA score data is prevalent and increases over time during ICU stays, potentially compromising the validity of SOFA score analyses.
- Inadequate reporting of missing data and imputation methods in studies limits the reliability of SOFA scores as a surrogate mortality endpoint.
- Clinical decision-makers must consider these limitations when interpreting study results that utilize SOFA scores.
Related Concept Videos
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Naturalistic Observations
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Censoring Survival Data
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies

