Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Automated tooth segmentation in magnetic resonance scans using deep learning - A pilot study.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2024
Same author

Dental MRI-only a future vision or standard of care? A literature review on current indications and applications of MRI in dentistry.

Dento maxillo facial radiology·2023
Same author

Who Seeks Clear Aligner Therapy? A European Cross-National Real-World Data Analysis.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Factors Influencing Patient Compliance during Clear Aligner Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of clinical medicine·2021
Same author

Horizontal bone grafting using equine-derived cancellous bone blocks is associated with severe complications: A prospective clinical and histological pilot study.

Clinical oral implants research·2020
Same author

Fully guided implant surgery using Magnetic Resonance Imaging - An in vitro study on accuracy in human mandibles.

Clinical oral implants research·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.1K

Predicting Outcome in Clear Aligner Treatment: A Machine Learning Analysis.

Daniel Wolf1, Gasser Farrag2, Tabea Flügge3

  • 1Independent Researcher, Berlin 13089, Germany.

Journal of Clinical Medicine
|July 13, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning models can predict refinement risk in clear aligner therapy (CAT). Key factors include patient compliance and tooth movement, aiding treatment planning for better outcomes.

Keywords:
artificial intelligenceclear alignersmachine learningmalocclusionorthodonticspredictionprognosis optimization

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.1K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.2K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Clear aligner therapy (CAT) is a popular orthodontic treatment.
  • Predicting the need for refinement (additional treatment) is crucial for efficiency.
  • Machine learning (ML) offers potential for risk prediction in CAT.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate ML models for predicting refinement risk in CAT.
  • To identify key predictors influencing refinement risk.
  • To assess the accuracy of different ML algorithms for this prediction task.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a dataset of 9942 anonymized CAT patients.
  • Employed three ML methods: logistic regression (L1), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and support vector classification.
  • Selected 74 clinically relevant factors as predictors.

Main Results:

  • Logistic regression and XGBoost models showed moderate predictive accuracy (AUC ~0.67).
  • Identified patient compliance, interproximal enamel reduction (IPR), and specific tooth movements as significant predictors.
  • Lingual translation of maxillary incisors was associated with lowest risk; mandibular incisor rotation with highest risk.

Conclusions:

  • Regularized logistic regression and XGBoost provide moderately accurate, well-calibrated predictions for CAT refinement risk.
  • Identified factors significantly influence refinement risk, highlighting their importance in treatment planning.
  • Predictive models can support tailored clinical decisions, potentially reducing treatment time and patient discomfort.