Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

G Protein-coupled Receptors01:15

G Protein-coupled Receptors

11.7K
G Protein-Coupled Receptors or GPCRs are membrane-bound receptors that transiently associate with heterotrimeric G proteins and induce an appropriate response to sensory stimuli such as light, odors, hormones, cytokines, or neurotransmitters.
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
11.7K
Transducer Mechanism: G Protein–Coupled Receptors01:30

Transducer Mechanism: G Protein–Coupled Receptors

1.9K
G Protein–Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) are membrane-bound receptors that transiently associate with heterotrimeric G proteins and induce an appropriate response to various stimuli. GPCRs regulate critical physiological pathways and are excellent drug targets for treating diseases such as diabetes, cancer, obesity, depression, or Alzheimer's. Nearly 35% of approved drugs implement their therapeutic effects by selectively interacting with specific GPCRs.
GPCRs are also called heptahelical,...
1.9K
G-protein Coupled Receptors01:21

G-protein Coupled Receptors

117.9K
G-protein coupled receptors are ligand binding receptors that indirectly affect changes in the cell. The actual receptor is a single polypeptide that transverses the cell membrane seven times creating intracellular and extracellular loops. The extracellular loops create a ligand specific pocket which binds to neurotransmitters or hormones. The intracellular loops holds onto the G-protein.
117.9K
The Two-State Receptor Model01:29

The Two-State Receptor Model

1.9K
The two-state receptor model explains a drug's interaction with receptors, such as G protein-coupled receptors and ligand-gated ion channels, to induce or inhibit a biological response. When no natural ligands are present, a receptor exists in an equilibrium of inactive (Ri) and active (Ra) conformations. The inactive form does not produce a response, while the active form generates a basal effect known as constitutive activity.
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with...
1.9K
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

12.8K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
12.8K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.2K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Synthetic Training Enables Deployment on Raw Drone Data: An Attention-Based Framework for Detecting Orphan Wells.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Differentiable multiphase flow model for physics-informed machine learning in reservoir pressure management.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Material Fracturing and Failure Simulation Datasets.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Information extraction from historical well records using a large language model.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Unlocking Solutions: Innovative Approaches to Identifying and Mitigating the Environmental Impacts of Undocumented Orphan Wells in the United States.

Environmental science & technology·2024
Same author

Aerial imagery dataset of lost oil wells.

Scientific data·2024
Same journal

RETRACTED: Kim et al. The Angiogenesis Inhibitor ALS-L1023 from Lemon-Balm Leaves Attenuates High-Fat Diet-Induced Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Through Regulating the Visceral Adipose-Tissue Function. <i>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</i> 2017, <i>18</i>, 846.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same journal

Correction: Mahmud et al. Thymoquinone Attenuates NF-κβ Signalling Activation in Retinal Pigment Epithelium Cells Under AMD-Mimicking Conditions. <i>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</i> 2025, <i>26</i>, 11473.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same journal

Correction: Borovikov et al. The Twisting and Untwisting of Actin and Tropomyosin Filaments Are Involved in the Molecular Mechanisms of Muscle Contraction, and Their Disruption Can Result in Muscle Disorders. <i>Int. J. Mol. Sci</i>. 2025, <i>26</i>, 6705.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same journal

Correction: Molagoda et al. Flavonoid Glycosides from <i>Ziziphus jujuba</i> var. <i>inermis</i> (Bunge) Rehder Seeds Inhibit α-Melanocyte-Stimulating Hormone-Mediated Melanogenesis. <i>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</i> 2021, <i>22</i>, 7701.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same journal

Correction: Guo et al. Integrated Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis Reveals the Molecular Regulatory Mechanism of Flavonoid Biosynthesis in Maize Roots Under Lead Stress. <i>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</i> 2024, <i>25</i>, 6050.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same journal

Correction: Chang et al. Improvement of Carbon Tetrachloride-Induced Acute Hepatic Failure by Transplantation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Without Reprogramming Factor c-Myc. <i>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</i> 2012, <i>13</i>, 3598-3617.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2025

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.6K

G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Ligand Pose and Functional Class Prediction.

Gregory L Szwabowski1, Makenzie Griffing1, Elijah J Mugabe1

  • 1Department of Chemistry, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences
|July 13, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Predicting drug interactions with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is crucial for drug discovery. This study found that while ligand interaction fingerprints offered minor benefits, a random forest classifier accurately predicted ligand function for GPCRs.

Keywords:
G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)dockinginteraction fingerprintmachine learningrandom forest classifier

More Related Videos

Parallel Interrogation of &#946;-Arrestin2 Recruitment for Ligand Screening on a GPCR-Wide Scale using PRESTO-Tango Assay
09:03

Parallel Interrogation of β-Arrestin2 Recruitment for Ligand Screening on a GPCR-Wide Scale using PRESTO-Tango Assay

Published on: March 10, 2020

12.3K
Measuring G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling via Radio-labeled GTP Binding
10:13

Measuring G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling via Radio-labeled GTP Binding

Published on: June 9, 2017

16.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2025

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.6K
Parallel Interrogation of &#946;-Arrestin2 Recruitment for Ligand Screening on a GPCR-Wide Scale using PRESTO-Tango Assay
09:03

Parallel Interrogation of β-Arrestin2 Recruitment for Ligand Screening on a GPCR-Wide Scale using PRESTO-Tango Assay

Published on: March 10, 2020

12.3K
Measuring G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling via Radio-labeled GTP Binding
10:13

Measuring G-protein-coupled Receptor Signaling via Radio-labeled GTP Binding

Published on: June 9, 2017

16.3K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacology
  • Computational Chemistry
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are vital transmembrane proteins and frequent drug targets.
  • Virtual screening (VS) is extensively used in drug discovery programs targeting GPCRs.
  • Enhancing the accuracy of predicting molecule binding and function for GPCRs can accelerate drug discovery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the advantage of ligand interaction fingerprints over automated methods for binding site selection in docking.
  • To determine if ligand interaction fingerprints can predict the functional status (agonist, antagonist, inverse agonist) of candidate molecules using a random forest classifier.

Main Methods:

  • Classical docking simulations were performed.
  • Ligand interaction fingerprints were assessed for their utility in binding site selection and pose sampling.
  • A random forest classifier was trained and tested using ligand-receptor complex data to predict ligand function.
  • The classifier's performance was evaluated on an external test set of GPR31 and TAAR2 ligands.

Main Results:

  • Ligand interaction fingerprints provided modest advantages in sampling accurate poses but no substantial benefit in top-ranked poses after scoring.
  • The random forest classifier effectively predicted ligand function, classifying agonists, antagonists, and inverse agonists as active.
  • The binary classifier achieved an 82.6% hit rate for actual actives within the predicted active set on an external test set.

Conclusions:

  • Ligand interaction fingerprints are not essential for generating high-quality ligand-receptor complexes for GPCR drug discovery.
  • Random forest classification using ligand interaction fingerprints is a highly effective method for predicting GPCR ligand functional status.
  • This predictive capability can significantly accelerate the identification of novel GPCR-targeting drug candidates.