Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2025

A Swin Transformer-Based Model for Thyroid Nodule Detection in Ultrasound Images
Published on: April 21, 2023
Bridging Convolutional Neural Networks and Transformers for Efficient Crack Detection in Concrete Building
Dhirendra Prasad Yadav1, Bhisham Sharma2, Shivank Chauhan1
1Department of Computer Engineering & Applications, G.L.A. University, Mathura 281406, India.
A new Convolution and Composite Attention Transformer Network (CCTNet) model improves building crack detection. This advanced method offers higher precision and efficiency than traditional techniques for structural integrity assessments.
Area of Science:
- Civil Engineering
- Computer Science
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Accurate crack detection in buildings is crucial for safety, longevity, and economic value.
- Conventional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) methods for crack detection have limitations, including high computational costs and shallow feature extraction.
- Existing deep learning (DL) techniques may not fully capture complex crack characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel Convolution and Composite Attention Transformer Network (CCTNet) model for enhanced crack detection in building structures.
- To address the limitations of conventional CNNs, such as high computational costs and inadequate feature representation.
- To improve the accuracy, efficiency, and reliability of crack identification in the built environment.
Main Methods:
- Developed a novel CCTNet model integrating convolution, channel attention, and window-based self-attention mechanisms.
- Utilized an improved cross-attention module to enhance feature interaction and integration across windows.
- Leveraged both localized feature extraction (CNN) and global contextual understanding (self-attention).
Main Results:
- CCTNet achieved high precision rates: 98.60% on Historical Building Crack2019, 98.93% on SDTNET2018, and 99.33% on the proposed DS3 dataset.
- The model demonstrated near-zero training validation loss, indicating effective learning.
- Achieved Area Under the Curve (AUC) scores of 0.99 for Historical Building Crack2019 and 0.98 for SDTNET2018.
Conclusions:
- The proposed CCTNet model significantly outperforms existing methodologies for building crack detection.
- CCTNet offers an accurate, efficient, and reliable solution for identifying structural cracks.
- The model sets a new benchmark for automated crack detection in the built environment.
Related Concept Videos
Microcracking in Concrete
Types of Non-structural Cracks in Concrete
Plastic shrinkage cracks typically form within hours after the concrete is poured. The concrete's surface dries faster than the bottom, creating tensile stress that the still-plastic concrete cannot withstand, leading to diagonal or randomly patterned cracks on the concrete surface.
Tensile Strength Considerations of Concrete
The dimensions and shape of a concrete specimen...
Effects of Creep
Mass Concreting
To reduce the risk of such cracking, the concrete mix may incorporate low-heat cement and pozzolans to reduce the temperature rise. Pre-cooled angular aggregates and water-reducing admixtures...
Shrinkage in Concrete
When concrete is still in its plastic state, it can undergo a decrease in volume by about 1% of its absolute volume. This decrease is known as plastic shrinkage. It arises either...

