Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

79
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
79

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Experimental Confirmation of van der Waals-Enhanced Growth of Sulfuric Acid/Water Nanoparticles.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2025
Same author

Semiempirical H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-H<sub>2</sub>O Cluster Standard Gibbs Reaction Energies from Nucleation Experiments: Improved Temperature Dependence.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2022
Same author

Particle Formation from Photooxidation of αpinene, Limonene, and Myrcene.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2022
Same author

Applying robust design to study the effects of stratigraphic characteristics on brittle failure and bump potential in a coal mine.

International journal of mining science and technology·2018
Same author

Speciated Monitoring of Gas-Phase Organic Peroxy Radicals by Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Cross-Reactions between CH<sub>3</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>3</sub>(CO)O<sub>2</sub>, (CH<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>CO<sub>2</sub>, and c-C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>11</sub>O<sub>2</sub>.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2017
Same author

Beyond Ecosystem Services: Valuing the Invaluable.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2017
Same journal

Review of Filters for Air Sampling and Chemical Analysis in Mining Workplaces.

Minerals (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same journal

Metal Lability and Mass Transfer Response to Direct-Planting Phytostabilization of Pyritic Mine Tailings.

Minerals (Basel, Switzerland)·2022
Same journal

Graphite-Based Geothermometry on Almahata Sitta Ureilitic Meteorites.

Minerals (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same journal

Crystal Chemistry of Carnotite in Abandoned Mine Wastes.

Minerals (Basel, Switzerland)·2021
Same journal

Bridging the Gaps: Bole and Terra Sigillata as Artefacts, as <i>Simples</i> and as Antibacterial Clays.

Minerals (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same journal

Mineralogical Characterization and Dissolution Experiments in Gamble's Solution of Tremolitic Amphibole from Passo di Caldenno (Sondrio, Italy).

Minerals (Basel, Switzerland)·2019
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2025

A Uniaxial Compression Experiment with CO2-Bearing Coal Using a Visualized and Constant-Volume Gas-Solid Coupling Test System
10:27

A Uniaxial Compression Experiment with CO2-Bearing Coal Using a Visualized and Constant-Volume Gas-Solid Coupling Test System

Published on: June 12, 2019

8.7K

Using Machine Learning to Evaluate Coal Geochemical Data with Respect to Dynamic Failures.

David R Hanson1, Heather E Lawson1

  • 1CDC NIOSH Spokane Mining Research Division, Spokane, WA 99207, USA.

Minerals (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 16, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models can predict dynamic failure events in coal mining using geochemical data. This research enhances safety by identifying key geochemical markers for dynamic failure probability assessment.

Keywords:
bumpburstcoaldynamic failuremachine learning

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K
Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
08:27

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2025

A Uniaxial Compression Experiment with CO2-Bearing Coal Using a Visualized and Constant-Volume Gas-Solid Coupling Test System
10:27

A Uniaxial Compression Experiment with CO2-Bearing Coal Using a Visualized and Constant-Volume Gas-Solid Coupling Test System

Published on: June 12, 2019

8.7K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K
Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines
08:27

Author Spotlight: Efficient Image Recognition Using Directional Gradient Histogram Technique and Support Vector Machines

Published on: January 5, 2024

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Geochemistry
  • Mining Engineering
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Dynamic failure events pose significant risks in underground coal mining.
  • Previous research identified geochemical markers correlating with these events, but causality is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a machine learning model for assessing dynamic failure probability using geochemical and petrographic data.
  • To identify key geochemical parameters influencing dynamic failure.

Main Methods:

  • Applied machine learning techniques including linear regression, random forest, dimensionality reduction, and cluster analysis.
  • Utilized data from the Pennsylvania Coal Sample Databank and Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) accident data.
  • Performed hierarchical clustering after dimensionality reduction.

Main Results:

  • Identified 7 out of 18 geochemical parameters as most impactful for model performance.
  • Achieved high classification precision: 85.7% with logistic regression and 96.7% with random forest.
  • Discovered four distinct clusters, with one predominantly representing dynamic failure events.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning models can effectively predict dynamic failure events in coal mines.
  • Geochemical composition is a significant predictor of dynamic failure.
  • Further research can refine predictive models for enhanced mine safety.