Ultrasound-guided vs. Standard Coronary Access in Coronary Angiography: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ibrahim Omer1,2, Mohammed Bukhari1,2, Mohammad Alsharif3

  • 1College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Insights

Ultrasound guidance during coronary artery catheterization significantly reduces procedural complications like hematoma formation. This safer approach improves patient outcomes and supports wider clinical adoption.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Interventional Procedures

Background:

  • Coronary angiography is crucial for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD).
  • Traditional landmark-based vascular access carries risks.
  • Ultrasound offers a potentially safer, accessible alternative for guiding catheterization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided coronary artery catheterization.
  • To compare complication rates between ultrasound-guided and landmark-based approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
  • Adherence to PRISMA guidelines.
  • Independent data extraction by two reviewers.

Main Results:

  • Ultrasound-guided catheterization significantly reduced total complications (RR=0.53).
  • A significant reduction in hematoma >5 cm formation was observed (RR=0.43).
  • Statistical significance was confirmed for both outcomes (P < .001 and P = 0.003, respectively).

Conclusions:

  • Ultrasound-guided catheterization improves peri-catheterization outcomes compared to landmark-based methods.
  • The findings support the consideration of ultrasound guidance in clinical practice.
  • Further research is warranted to solidify its role.
Abstract