Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

125
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
125
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

91
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
91
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Protein losing enteropathy and hypoalbuminemia after cardiac surgery.

Journal of cardiothoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Acetaminophen in pregnancy.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·2026
Same author

Maternal attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and adverse obstetrical and perinatal outcomes: A population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada.

American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM·2026
Same author

Vaccination Vexations.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated with a Significantly Elevated Risk of Mortality: A Population-Level Database Study.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same author

Safety of acetaminophen use in pregnancy: review of existing evidence.

American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM·2026
Same journal

Trainee-Led Patient Education to Increase Advance Care Planning in a Geriatric Primary Care Clinic.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Scholarly Outcomes of a Small Projects Grant Program.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Health Status of Older Adults at Risk of SNAP Disenrollment Under Work Requirement Expansion: A National Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Comparison in the Use of Regulatory Pathways Between Health Canada and the Food and Drug Administration: A Cross-sectional Study.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

From Patient to Person: An EHR-Integrated "About Me" Tool Allows Patients to Digitally Share Non-Medical Information.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Association Between Hospital-Based Addiction Consult Service Implementation and Hospital Length-of-Stay and 30-Day Readmission Rates for Patients with Opioid Use Disorder.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2025

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.4K

Seeing the Truth About Double Blinding.

Donald A Redelmeier1,2,3,4, Jonathan S Zipursky5,6,7,8,9

  • 1Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. dar@ices.on.ca.

Journal of General Internal Medicine
|July 16, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Inadequate blinding in clinical trials can introduce bias, affecting patient outcomes. Understanding these pitfalls is crucial for accurately interpreting evidence-based medicine from blinded randomized trials.

Keywords:
concealed allocationdatabase researchdouble blindinginterpretation and biasmaskingrandomized trial

More Related Videos

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
00:04

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.6K
Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
05:25

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Published on: March 29, 2019

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2025

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia
06:14

A Method for Investigating Change Blindness in Pigeons Columba Livia

Published on: September 7, 2018

6.4K
A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
00:04

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

10.6K
Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
05:25

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise

Published on: March 29, 2019

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Research Integrity

Background:

  • Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) rely on baseline balancing of confounders and effective blinding to control extraneous factors.
  • Inadequate blinding can compromise the internal validity of RCTs, leading to biased results.
  • Interpreting RCTs for evidence-based medicine requires careful consideration of potential biases introduced by unblinding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a three-part taxonomy of common pitfalls arising from inadequate blinding in clinical trials.
  • To introduce a cautionary framework for readers to critically evaluate blinded RCTs.
  • To illustrate potential biases with examples related to group assignment knowledge.

Main Methods:

  • Classification of blinding pitfalls into three categories: study conduct, data analysis, and oversight.
  • Use of illustrative examples to demonstrate how knowledge of group assignment can introduce bias.
  • Development of a framework for interpreting blinded RCTs in evidence-based medicine.

Main Results:

  • Identified pitfalls during study conduct, including inadequate blinding of participants, controls, and clinicians.
  • Highlighted data analysis pitfalls such as unsubstantiated blinding claims and compromised blinding tests.
  • Described oversight-related pitfalls involving unblinding of ethics boards and reviewers.

Conclusions:

  • Awareness of specific blinding pitfalls is essential for accurate interpretation of RCTs.
  • These caveats can lead to misunderstandings regarding the relationship between interventions and patient outcomes.
  • Understanding and addressing blinding issues enhances the reliability of RCTs for evidence-based medical care.