Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2025

A Kinetic Fluorescence-based Ca2+ Mobilization Assay to Identify G Protein-coupled Receptor Agonists, Antagonists, and Allosteric Modulators
Published on: February 20, 2018
Systems modeling of oncogenic G-protein and GPCR signaling reveals unexpected differences in downstream pathway
Michael Trogdon1,2, Kodye Abbott3, Nadia Arang4,5
1Integrative Biology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
Abstract:
Mathematical models of biochemical reaction networks are an important and emerging tool for the study of cell signaling networks involved in disease processes. One promising potential application of such mathematical models is the study of how disease-causing mutations promote the signaling phenotype that contributes to the disease. It is commonly assumed that one must have a thorough characterization of the network readily available for mathematical modeling to be useful, but we hypothesized that mathematical modeling could be useful when there is incomplete knowledge and that it could be a tool for discovery that opens new areas for further exploration. In the present study, we first develop a mechanistic mathematical model of a G-protein coupled receptor signaling network that is mutated in almost all cases of uveal melanoma and use model-driven explorations to uncover and explore multiple new areas for investigating this disease. Modeling the two major, mutually-exclusive, oncogenic mutations (Gαq/11 and CysLT2R) revealed the potential for previously unknown qualitative differences between seemingly interchangeable disease-promoting mutations, and our experiments confirmed oncogenic CysLT2R was impaired at activating the FAK/YAP/TAZ pathway relative to Gαq/11. This led us to hypothesize that CYSLTR2 mutations in UM must co-occur with other mutations to activate FAK/YAP/TAZ signaling, and our bioinformatic analysis uncovers a role for co-occurring mutations involving the plexin/semaphorin pathway, which has been shown capable of activating this pathway. Overall, this work highlights the power of mechanism-based computational systems biology as a discovery tool that can leverage available information to open new research areas.
Insights
Mathematical modeling of cell signaling networks can uncover disease mechanisms even with incomplete data. This study used modeling to reveal distinct roles of mutations in uveal melanoma, identifying new therapeutic targets.
Area of Science:
- Computational systems biology
- Biochemical reaction network modeling
- Oncogenic signaling pathways
Background:
- Mathematical models are crucial for understanding cell signaling in diseases.
- This study challenges the assumption that complete network knowledge is required for modeling.
- Focuses on G-protein coupled receptor signaling in uveal melanoma.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a mathematical model of a G-protein coupled receptor signaling network mutated in uveal melanoma.
- To use model-driven exploration to discover new research avenues for uveal melanoma.
- To investigate the functional differences between oncogenic mutations.
Main Methods:
- Mechanistic mathematical modeling of signaling networks.
- In silico exploration of model behavior.
- Experimental validation of model predictions.
- Bioinformatic analysis of mutation co-occurrence.
Main Results:
- Identified qualitative differences between Gαq/11 and CysLT2R mutations in activating the FAK/YAP/TAZ pathway.
- Confirmed CysLT2R mutations are impaired in FAK/YAP/TAZ pathway activation compared to Gαq/11.
- Discovered potential co-occurrence of CYSLTR2 mutations with plexin/semaphorin pathway mutations in uveal melanoma.
Conclusions:
- Mathematical modeling can be a powerful discovery tool, even with incomplete biological knowledge.
- Revealed distinct roles for mutations in uveal melanoma signaling.
- Uncovered novel hypotheses regarding uveal melanoma pathogenesis and potential therapeutic strategies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
Amplifying Signals via Enzymatic Cascade
Assembly of Signaling Complexes
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
Amplifying Signals via Second Messengers
Diversity in Cell Signaling Responses
Graded and Abrupt Responses
Some signaling systems generate...

