Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
Bias01:22

Bias

4.1K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.1K
Ethics and Bioethics01:22

Ethics and Bioethics

1.3K
Ethics is a philosophical study of moral actions. Ethics attempts to determine what is valuable for individuals and society. It examines the rational justification of moral judgments and analyzes what is morally just, fair, and right. Bioethics is a sub-discipline of applied ethics that analyzes the philosophical, social, and legal issues in life sciences and medicine. Ethical theories serve as a foundation for decision-making and represent the viewpoints from which people seek direction. They...
1.3K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

32.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

125
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
125
Archival Research01:40

Archival Research

16.0K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
16.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Immunotherapeutic Approaches to Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Current Clinical Practice and Future Directions.

Head & neck·2026
Same author

Application of Sydney System for Lymph Node Cytology at a Tertiary Care Centre in Central India.

Diagnostic cytopathology·2026
Same author

Non-Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx: Primary Surgery or (Chemo)radiotherapy?

Head & neck·2026
Same author

Strategies and successes of smoking cessation methods in head and neck cancer patients: a systematic review.

Cancer metastasis reviews·2026
Same author

Reply to Borewad et al. Comment on "Rao et al. The Oncological Outcome of Postoperative Radiotherapy in Patients with Node-Negative Early-Stage (T1/T2/N0) Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Perineural Invasion: A Meta-Analysis. <i>Cancers</i> 2025, <i>17</i>, 862".

Cancers·2026
Same author

Prognostic Impact of MYC/TP63 Molecular Subtypes in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

Cancers·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

9.9K

Misconducts in research and methods to uphold research integrity.

Karthik N Rao1, Manish Mair2, Ripu D Arora3

  • 1Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Sri Shankara Cancer Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Indian Journal of Cancer
|July 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Research misconduct, including data falsification and plagiarism, undermines scientific integrity. Awareness of misconduct in statistical analysis and reporting is crucial for researchers and readers.

More Related Videos

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory
13:39

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Published on: July 7, 2023

14.0K
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

70.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

9.9K
Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory
13:39

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Published on: July 7, 2023

14.0K
The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

70.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research Ethics
  • Scientific Integrity

Background:

  • Research misconduct involves data manipulation, fabrication, plagiarism, and undisclosed conflicts of interest.
  • Data falsification and p-hacking can promote misleading information in medical research.
  • Undisclosed conflicts of interest (COI) can bias research and damage institutional reputation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define and categorize various forms of research misconduct.
  • To highlight the negative impact of misconduct on scientific findings and public trust.
  • To emphasize the need for widespread awareness regarding misconduct in statistical analysis and reporting.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common research misconduct practices.
  • Analysis of the consequences of data falsification, p-hacking, and cherry-picking.
  • Discussion of the role of conflicts of interest in research integrity.

Main Results:

  • Identified key forms of misconduct: data fabrication, plagiarism, p-hacking, undisclosed COI, hypothesis after results known, and cherry-picking.
  • Established that these practices lead to the dissemination of false or misleading scientific information.
  • Highlighted the critical importance of transparency in methods and honest reporting.

Conclusions:

  • Researchers must be transparent and report findings accurately to maintain scientific integrity.
  • Institutions need robust policies to address and prevent research misconduct.
  • Educating researchers and readers on misconduct in statistical analysis and reporting is imperative.