Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Automated 90Sr Separation and Preconcentration in a Lab-on-Valve System at Ppq Level
Published on: June 6, 2018
Transfer functions forQA/QBinternational regulatory limits for the safe transport of radioactive materials
Thomas Frosio1, Samuel Thomas2, Janis Endres3
1SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025-7015, United States of America.
Abstract:
This paper presents a proposed revision of the International Atomic Energy Agency transport regulations, related to theA1andA2limit values used to determine the radioactive transport classification. Based on the 'Qsystem', a novel methodology was introduced to deriveQAandQBvalues related to scenarios involving external exposure from a distant source. These values are key parameters that respectively represent the total effective dose and total equivalent dose to the skin, from all primary and secondary particles contributing to radiation exposure. The International Working Group (WGA1/A2) is established and associated with the TRANSSC Technical Expert Group on Radiation Protection. A review of theA1andA2values is performed in response to identified limitations within the existingQsystem. The followed approach is based on Monte Carlo simulations that enabled the development of transfer functions aimed at reducing computational time and increasing the flexibility of dose evaluations for any radionuclide with known particle emission spectra. This method allows updating theQAandQBvalues to account for future data evolutions (decay data, fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients) and standardizing the calculation of regulation limits across all referenced radionuclides and scenarios related to external exposure. The transfer functions are established using three Monte Carlo simulation codes-FLUKA, Geant4, and MCNP-and address the previous limitations of the 'Qsystem', reflecting the latest International Commission for Radiation Protection recommendations and improvements in calculation techniques. The results of the WG show consistent agreement across the codes, with minor discrepancies observed at low primary energies due to statistical uncertainties and different handling of stopping power for electrons/positrons in the codes. This revised approach aligns with current standards and recommendations, ensuring that the radiological consequences of transport accidents are acceptable for the newA1andA2limits from a radiological protection perspective.
More Related Videos
09:18Laser-heating and Radiance Spectrometry for the Study of Nuclear Materials in Conditions Simulating a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
Published on: December 14, 2017
07:52A Novel Technique for Raman Analysis of Highly Radioactive Samples Using Any Standard Micro-Raman Spectrometer
Published on: April 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Regulated mRNA Transport
Nuclear Power
Nuclear Fuels
Nuclear fuel consists of a fissile isotope, such as uranium-235, which must be present in sufficient quantity to provide a...
Biological Effects of Radiation
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Isotopes and Radioisotopes
An isotope containing...