Apixaban vs Aspirin According to CHA2DS2-VASc Score in Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation: Insights From ARTESiA

Renato D Lopes1, Christopher B Granger1, Daniel M Wojdyla1

  • 1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Insights

Apixaban significantly reduced stroke risk in patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation and high CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Benefits of apixaban outweigh risks for high-risk patients, while aspirin may be preferred for low-risk individuals.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • The ARTESiA trial investigated apixaban versus aspirin in patients with device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation.
  • Apixaban reduced stroke and systemic embolism (SE) but increased major bleeding compared to aspirin.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of apixaban based on baseline CHA2DS2-VASc scores in patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation.
  • To inform clinical decision-making regarding apixaban use in this patient population.

Main Methods:

  • A subgroup analysis of the ARTESiA trial was performed.
  • Patients were stratified by baseline CHA2DS2-VASc scores (<4, =4, >4).
  • Relative and absolute differences in stroke/SE and major bleeding rates were assessed.

Main Results:

  • In patients with CHA2DS2-VASc >4, apixaban showed a stroke rate of 0.98%/year vs. 2.25%/year for aspirin, preventing 1.28 strokes/SE per 100 patient-years.
  • For CHA2DS2-VASc <4, apixaban had a stroke/SE rate of 0.85%/year vs. 0.97%/year for aspirin.
  • For CHA2DS2-VASc =4, apixaban prevented 0.32 strokes/SE per 100 patient-years and caused 0.28 major bleeds per 100 patient-years.

Conclusions:

  • Apixaban offers greater benefits than risks for patients with subclinical atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2-VASc scores >4.
  • For patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores <4, the risks of apixaban may outweigh the benefits.
  • Treatment decisions for patients with intermediate CHA2DS2-VASc scores (=4) should consider individual patient preferences.
Abstract