Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration01:10

Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration

347
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
347

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Individual and combined associations of physical activity and cognitive function with all-cause mortality in older men and women: a prospective analysis of the German National Cohort (NAKO).

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Determinants of the Uptake and Frequency of Use of a Web Portal Digital Health Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and/or Coronary Heart Disease: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Temporal trends and correlates of overall and domain-specific sitting time in Germany between 2014 and 2023.

BMC public health·2025
Same author

Assessing forearm exertion in manual tasks with surface EMG: A comparative analysis of through-forearm vs. muscle-specific EMG placements.

Applied ergonomics·2025
Same author

Factors associated with intention to use an educative mHealth application among high-risk target groups in health prevention.

mHealth·2025
Same author

The hidden athlete: exploring work and performance ability of professional dancers through a mixed-method-approach.

BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
07:24

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis

Published on: August 8, 2019

6.7K

Thigh-worn accelerometry: a comparative study of two no-code classification methods for identifying physical activity

Claas Lendt1, Theresa Braun2, Bianca Biallas2

  • 1Institute for Movement Therapy and Movement-Oriented Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany. claas.lendt@stud.dshs-koeln.de.

The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
|July 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Two no-code software methods accurately classify physical activities and postures from thigh-worn accelerometry data. SENS motion and ActiPASS demonstrate high agreement with reference labels in free-living conditions.

Keywords:
AccelerometerActivity classificationHuman activity recognitionPhysical behaviourSedentary behaviourValidation

More Related Videos

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

12.5K
Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
06:51

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training

Published on: July 27, 2022

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis
07:24

Home-Based Monitor for Gait and Activity Analysis

Published on: August 8, 2019

6.7K
A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers
07:24

A Method for Quantifying Upper Limb Performance in Daily Life Using Accelerometers

Published on: April 21, 2017

12.5K
Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training
06:51

Physical Activity Measurement in Children Accepting Table Tennis Training

Published on: July 27, 2022

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Human Movement Science
  • Wearable Technology

Background:

  • Accurate assessment of free-living physical behavior is crucial for understanding health and well-being.
  • Thigh-worn accelerometry offers a promising method for identifying activity types and postures.
  • User-friendly, no-code software solutions are needed to increase the adoption of accelerometry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the classification accuracy of two novel no-code software methods: SENS motion and ActiPASS.
  • To compare the performance of these methods in identifying physical activities and postures.
  • To assess their utility in both laboratory and free-living conditions.

Main Methods:

  • 38 healthy adults wore thigh-mounted SENS motion accelerometers (12.5 Hz).
  • Participants performed standardized laboratory activities and unrestricted free-living activities.
  • Video recordings with chest-mounted cameras served as reference annotations for free-living data.
  • Classification outputs from SENS motion and ActiPASS software were compared to reference labels.

Main Results:

  • Analysis of 63.6 hours of activity data showed high agreement between algorithms and references.
  • Cohen's kappa coefficients in free-living conditions were 0.86 for SENS motion and 0.92 for ActiPASS.
  • Mean balanced accuracy ranged from 0.81 (cycling) to 0.99 (running) for SENS motion and 0.92 (walking) to 0.99 (sedentary) for ActiPASS.

Conclusions:

  • Both SENS motion and ActiPASS no-code methods accurately classify basic physical activity types and postures.
  • The methods demonstrate high accuracy even with relatively low sampling frequency data.
  • Performance differences were noted, particularly in free-living cycling (SENS) and slow walking (ActiPASS), potentially due to differing activity class definitions.