Using machine learning to predict acute myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease in primary care

N Salet1, A Gökdemir1,2, J Preijde2

  • 1Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Plos One
|July 18, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Machine learning models significantly outperform the SMART algorithm in predicting acute myocardial infarction and ischemic heart disease in primary care. These advanced ML tools offer potential for improved cardiovascular disease prediction and personalized patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Informatics
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Cardiovascular disease (CVD) necessitates early detection, ideally in primary care settings.
  • Predicting acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) is crucial for effective CVD management.
  • Machine learning (ML) offers a novel approach to enhance CVD risk prediction in primary care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate ML models for predicting AMI and IHD in primary care patients.
  • To compare the performance of ML models against the established SMART risk prediction algorithm.
  • To identify key predictors contributing to ML model accuracy for CVD risk.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized patient-level medical record data (n=13,218) from 90 GP practices (2011-2021).
  • Constructed two random forest ML models (AMI and IHD) and a linear SMART algorithm model.
  • Employed temporal cross-validation for performance assessment and identified key predictive features.

Main Results:

  • ML models demonstrated superior performance over the SMART algorithm across all metrics.
  • The AMI prediction model achieved an accuracy of 0.97, AUC of 0.96, and Brier score of 0.03.
  • Key predictors included anticoagulants/antiplatelet use, systolic blood pressure, mean blood glucose, and eGFR.

Conclusions:

  • ML holds significant potential for improving CVD prediction accuracy in primary care.
  • ML models can support individualized risk assessments, aiding primary care physicians in prevention strategies.
  • While effective, the interpretability of ML model predictors requires further consideration for clinical integration.
Abstract