Efficiency and Safety of Intracoronary Epinephrine Administration in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Vyacheslav Ryabov1, Stanislav Dil1, Evgeny Vyshlov1

  • 1Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russian Federation.

Insights

Intracoronary adrenaline effectively treats refractory no-reflow in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This approach improves coronary flow, reduces microvascular obstruction, and enhances ejection fraction with a comparable safety profile.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Vascular Medicine

Background:

  • Refractory no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) poses a significant clinical challenge.
  • Current treatment options for refractory no-reflow are limited, with a need for more effective strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intracoronary adrenaline administration in patients with STEMI experiencing refractory no-reflow despite conventional treatment.
  • To compare coronary flow restoration, myocardial reperfusion, and microvascular obstruction between intracoronary adrenaline and conventional treatments.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective randomized study including 90 consecutive STEMI patients with refractory no-reflow after initial PCI.
  • Patients were randomized to receive either intracoronary adrenaline (Group 1, n=45) or conventional treatments alone (Group 2, n=45).
  • Outcomes assessed included coronary flow restoration (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3), STEMI resolution, indexed microvascular obstruction (MVO) volume, and ejection fraction (EF).

Main Results:

  • Intracoronary adrenaline significantly increased coronary flow restoration (56% vs 29%, p=0.01) and STEMI resolution (78% vs 36%, p<0.001).
  • The adrenaline group exhibited lower indexed MVO volume (0.9% vs 1.9%, p=0.048) and improved ejection fraction (p=0.025).
  • Intracoronary adrenaline demonstrated a safety profile comparable to conventional treatments regarding life-threatening arrhythmias.

Conclusions:

  • Intracoronary adrenaline administration is a more effective strategy than conventional treatments for refractory no-reflow in STEMI patients undergoing PCI.
  • This intervention improves coronary artery blood flow, facilitates myocardial reperfusion, enhances cardiac function (EF), and reduces MVO.
  • Intracoronary adrenaline represents a promising and safe therapeutic option for managing refractory no-reflow in STEMI.