Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Shrinkage of Dental Composite in Simulated Cavity Measured with Digital Image Correlation
Published on: July 21, 2014
Clinical evaluation of a new chemically-cured bulk-fill composite in posterior restorations: 6-month multicenter
Alessandro D Loguercio1, B Carpio-Salvatierra2, R Ñaupari-Villasante2
1State University of Ponta Grossa, School of Dentistry, Ponta Grossa/PR, 84030-000, Brazil; Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Carrera de Odontologia, Universidad De Los Hemisferios, Quito 170147, Ecuador.
Objective:
To evaluate the postoperative sensitivity (POS), as well as the clinical performance of posterior restorations using a new chemically-cured bulk-fill composite (Stela Automix and Stela Capsule, SDI) comparing with a light-cured bulk-fill composite after 6 months.
Methods:
Fifty-five participants with at least three posterior teeth needing restoration were recruited. A total of 165 restorations were performed on Class I or Class II cavities. After the application of Stela primer, the chemically-cured composite (Stela Automix or Stela Capsule) was inserted. For the light-cured composite group, a universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal) was applied with a bulk-fill composite (Filtek One). Participants were evaluated for spontaneous and stimulated POS in the baseline, after 48 h, 7 days, and 6 months. Additionally, each restoration was assessed using the updated version of FDI criteria after 6 months. The differences in the proportions of the groups were compared by Cochran test statistics (α = 0.05).
Results:
Both chemically-cured composites showed a lower risk of POS compared to the light-cured composite at baseline and up to 48 h (p < 0.04). A significantly lower surface luster and texture was observed for the Stela Capsule composite compared to the light-cured bulk-fill composite (baseline and 6 months; p = 0.03). A significant color mismatch was observed for the light-cured bulk-fill composite compared to the chemically-cured composites (baseline and 6 months; p = 0.03). No significant differences were observed in any other item evaluations (p > 0.05).
Conclusion:
Chemically-cured composites exhibit lower postoperative sensitivity and less color mismatch compared to a light-cured bulk-fill composite after 6 months of clinical service.
Clinical Significance:
The chemically-cured composites appear to be an appealing option for restoring posterior teeth, as they exhibit lower postoperative sensitivity compared to a light-cured bulk-fill composite, both at baseline and up to 48 h, and less color mismatch.
More Related Videos
07:42Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
05:30Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025