Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2025

A Model for Perineural Invasion in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: January 5, 2017
Oncological Outcome of Node-Positive Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas Treated With Selective and Comprehensive Neck
Jan Oliver Voss1,2, Lea Freund1, Felix Neumann1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1 13353, Berlin, Germany.
For oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with positive lymph nodes, both comprehensive neck dissection (CND) and selective neck dissection (SND) appear to be viable treatment options, with no significant difference in survival outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Head and Neck Surgery
- Oral Cancer Research
Background:
- Selective neck dissection (SND) is standard for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with clinically node-negative (cN0) necks.
- Treatment for clinically node-positive (cN+) OSCC necks involves either SND or comprehensive neck dissection (CND), with ongoing debate regarding the optimal approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of CND versus SND in patients with OSCC and clinically node-positive (cN+) necks.
- To identify independent risk factors affecting overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in this patient cohort.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 74 patients with OSCC, clinically (cN+) and pathologically (pN+) positive cervical lymph nodes (LNs).
- Patients were treated with either CND or SND between 2010-2019, with clear neck level categorization.
- Cox regression analysis was employed to assess survival outcomes and risk factors.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference was found between CND and SND regarding overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS).
- Regional recurrence rates were comparable: 5.77% for CND and 9.09% for SND.
- Extracapsular spread (ECS) and male sex were identified as independent risk factors for poorer OS; pT-stage and ECS were independent risk factors for DFS.
Conclusions:
- Both CND and SND can be considered viable treatment options for select patients diagnosed with OSCC and pathologically positive lymph nodes (pN+).
- Treatment decisions should consider patient-specific factors, including pT-stage and the presence of extracapsular spread (ECS).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Survival Analysis

