Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026
12:43
A Protocol for Comprehensive Assessment of Bulbar Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ALS
Published on: February 21, 2011
34.7K
Brain-computer interface for augmentative and alternative communication access: The initial training needs and
Kevin M Pitt1, Miechelle McKelvey2, Kristy Weissling1
1Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
|July 19, 2024
Summary
Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) identified key training needs for brain-computer interfaces for augmentative and alternative communication (BCI-AAC), including personalization and technical skills. Preferred learning strategies involve expert guidance and hands-on practice for effective BCI-AAC implementation.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Rehabilitation Engineering
- Speech-Language Pathology
Background:
- Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) is crucial for individuals with communication impairments.
- Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) offer a novel pathway for AAC access.
- A gap exists in specialized training for Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) in BCI-AAC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify the essential training needs of SLPs experienced in AAC for BCI-AAC.
- To determine the preferred learning strategies for BCI-AAC training among SLPs.
- To inform the codesign of a BCI-AAC training framework.
Main Methods:
- Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eleven experienced SLPs.
- A grounded theory approach was employed for thematic analysis.
- Data reliability was ensured through peer debriefing, member checking, and triangulation.
Main Results:
- SLPs highlighted critical training needs in intervention personalization, technical aspects, BCI-AAC system types, and stakeholder support.
- Preferred learning strategies included expert guidance, demonstrations, hands-on experience, and multimedia resources.
- Identified needs ranged from foundational knowledge to advanced intervention strategies.
Conclusions:
- The study provides foundational insights for developing a BCI-AAC training framework for SLPs.
- Findings support the codesign of clinically relevant BCI-AAC training programs.
- Addressing these needs will enhance SLP capacity in utilizing BCI-AAC technologies.
