Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2025

Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Benchmarking Charge-Transfer Excited States in TADF Emitters: ΔDFT Outperforms TD-DFT for Emission Energies
Thomas Froitzheim1, Lukas Kunze1, Stefan Grimme1
1Mulliken Center for Theoretical Chemistry, University of Bonn, Beringstr. 4, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Abstract:
Charge-transfer (CT) excited states are crucial to organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), particularly to those based on thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF). However, accurately modeling CT states remains challenging, even with modern implementations of (time-dependent) density functional theory [(TD-)DFT], especially in a dielectric environment. To identify shortcomings and improve the methodology, we previously established the STGABS27 benchmark set with highly accurate experimental references for the adiabatic energy gap between the lowest singlet and triplet excited states (ΔEST). Here, we diversify this set to the STGABS27-EMS benchmark by including experimental emission energies (Eem) and use this new set to (re)-evaluate various DFT-based approaches. Surprisingly, these tests demonstrate that a state-specific (un)restricted open-shell Kohn-Sham (U/ROKS) DFT coupled with a polarizable continuum model for perturbative state-specific nonequilibrium solvation (ptSS-PCM) provides exceptional accuracy for predicting Eem over a wide range of density functionals. In contrast, the main workhorse of the field, Tamm-Dancoff-approximated TD-DFT (TDA-DFT) paired with the same ptSS-PCM, is distinctly less accurate and strongly functional-dependent. More importantly, while TDA-DFT requires the choice of two very different density functionals for good performance on either ΔEST or Eem, the time-independent U/ROKS/PCM approaches deliver excellent accuracy for both quantities with a wide variety of functionals.
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Overview
Deactivation Processes: Jablonski Diagram
Atomic Spectroscopy: Absorption, Emission, and Fluorescence
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Lab

