Analyzing Racial Disparities in Pediatric Atopic Comorbidity Emergency Department Visitation Using Electronic Health

Esteban Correa-Agudelo1, Lili Ding2, Andrew F Beck3

  • 1Division of Asthma Research, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Insights

Racial disparities exist in emergency department (ED) visits for childhood atopic diseases. Black/African American children experienced more frequent ED visits and shorter time to recurrence for conditions like atopic dermatitis and asthma compared to White/European American children.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Allergy and Immunology
  • Health Services Research
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Atopic diseases and their comorbidities are common in children.
  • Little is known about racial differences in emergency department (ED) utilization for these conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate racial disparities in ED visits among children with allergic comorbidities.
  • To examine differences in ED encounter-free survival time and time to recurrence between Black/African American (AA) and White/European American (EA) children.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective study of patients (<21 years) visiting a pediatric ED for atopic dermatitis (AD), food allergy (FA), asthma, allergic rhinitis (AR), and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) from 2015-2019.
  • Analysis of hazard ratios (HRs) for ED encounters and time to recurrence (TTR).
  • Assessment of allergic, demographic, insurance, and place-based factors, including interactions with race.

Main Results:

  • 30,894 patients accounted for 83,078 ED encounters.
  • Asthma and AR were the most common comorbidities in ED visits for both AA and EA children.
  • AA children had higher HRs for encounters following initial AD and asthma visits.
  • Insurance type interacted with race, with Medicaid-insured AA children showing higher HRs and EA children showing lower HRs compared to commercially insured peers.
  • Allergic comorbidities increased the HR of ED encounters across all allergic diseases.
  • AA children had shorter mean TTR for AD, FA, and asthma at 5-year follow-up.

Conclusions:

  • Significant racial disparities in ED visitation for childhood atopic diseases were identified.
  • These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to reduce emergency care utilization equitably.
  • Understanding these disparities is crucial for designing effective strategies to improve care for atopic children.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR01:30

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) primarily center around electronically documenting patients' health information within a single healthcare organization or practice. They contain essential clinical data related to a patient's medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, lab results, and other pertinent information relevant to the specific encounter or episode of care. EMRs are designed to streamline documentation and workflow processes within individual healthcare...
829
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
225
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
158
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
109